Viktos Zerodark™ Vest: Staying Comfortable Between the Seasons

Intended for the intermediate climates between the heat of the summer, and the frigid temps of the winter, the Zerodark™ vest gives shooters the ideal blend of core temperature comfort and freedom in range of motion.

Comprised of Fitelite™ nylon, the Zerodark™ vest has a lightweight outer chassis designed by Viktos with an added water-resistant Dupont™ Teflon® coating for longstanding outdoor use. The Zerodark™ vest also includes an inner layer of 100g Thermolite® insulation for temperature regulation and to serve as a windbreaker.


At the top, the Zerodark™ vest has a high collar roll to protect from rifle sling abrasion or wind. A full length YKK zipper has a nylon pull tab with rubberized ends.

The sides include Viktos’ Attackposture™ design, that incorporate four-way, flexible back and underarm panels to give improved flexibility to accommodate a variety of shooting stances.

Along the bottom there are two chest-rig stylized cargo pockets in the front (one each side). These are secured by hook-and-loop, and include nylon draw-string tabs with shrink-tube ends. A low-profile side pocket on each side behind the cargo pockets include a zipper enclosure with a plastic pull tab.

Both sides of the Zerodark™ vest include Viktos’ Gunvent™ design, a unique, dual-zippered side that allows for immediate access to range belt or holstered sidearm while wearing the jacket.


The interior sides of the Zerodark™ vest have one large and one small angled accessory pocket on each side. In addition, the Viktos “Undefeated” logo appears on the right side front interior.

The Zerodark™ vest is available in Nightfall (featured), Ranger, or Coyote and sized between Small to 3XL.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • CostGood (4/5): Viktos currently has the MSRP for the Zerodark™ vest at $120, but is discounting it to $102 as the company prepares to rotate stock for the 2020 spring. With its materials and design, the Zerodark™ vest is both lightweight and functional that keeps the upper core warm despite the wild environmental changes of the spring or fall. In comparison, vests of similar make/material include the 5.11 Peninsula Insulator Vest ($99), Triple Aught Design Syntax Vest ($170), or Arc’teryx Atom LT Vest ($189) – all of which demonstrate the market for designer tactical clothing. As such the Zerodark™ vest, at its current available price of $99, makes it very competitive and among some of the more balanced options on the market given its design and materials.
  • Comfort Good (4/5): Given its lightweight material, and thickness of the insulation layers, the Zerodark™ vest was very comfortable in the early spring weather here in Missouri. Worn in average morning temperatures of 50s-60s, rising to low 70s by mid-day, the Zerodark™ vest allowed for comfortable regulation of temperature and adjusting comfort. The only notable negative aspect was in light winds where the Zerodark™ vest was limited in keeping the overall comfort maintained simply because of the lacking sleeves. Viktos does offer a full-length light Zerodark™ jacket made from the same design and materials, should there be those more interested in overall upper body coverage. The high collar did an excellent job of mitigating abrasion from the sling, and the Attackposture™ design did well to adjust to the more dynamic movements of the upper torso on the range.
  • Durability – Fair (2/5): There was an almost grid-like stitching pattern on the outer shell of the Zerodark™ vest that lends to its overall strength in durability. The outer layer was permeated with Teflon which gave it an almost slick feel between the fingers, and helped resist abrasion from things like sliding slings, gun belt, or other accessories. There was minimal double line or overlap stitching, and what was observed was around the zipper or collar line to reinforce the material there. While some thread excess was noted (and easily removed), it was most likely attributed to the manufacturing process. However, prior to conducting range drills there were at least two missed stitches observed; one at the collar line and the other on the interior liner that could also be explained by lapses in the manufacturing process. While minimal, and unlikely to affect the durability of the product in the short-term, over a longer period the threading could become compromised. Indeed, following use on the range, the missed stitch on the collar had broken and the threads needed to be cut. Obviously one recommendation for Viktos would be to consider adding bartack stitching in/around the zipper, along the pockets and its hook-and-loop panels, or high abrasion/tension points.
  • Functionality Average (3/5): The Zerodark™ vest adequately fulfilled its role as a base layer vest for light-to-moderate use—as well as served as an alternative to the Zerodark™ jacket. In that role, the material did keep the user’s central core very comfortable, while the sleeveless design helped to regulate excess heat. On the range, the high collar proved well placed and the Attackposture™ panels did provide for good flexibility in more dynamic movements to the side or in twisting. The YKK zippers for the front and on the Gunvent™ sides provided for smooth and quiet function. The chest rig pockets were very wide and allowed for multiple rifle magazines to be kept there, though it did increase the bulk of the vest. There was sufficient material to close the vest with an IWB CCW holster worn, though access through the Gunvent™ was a little tricky as opposed to simply lifting the vest and conducting the draw. With a gun belt worn (secondary handgun, mag pouches, IFAK), the vest did not have sufficient material to cover the belt and still be closed in the front. It was only with the Gunvent™ open on the side, to allot for room for the OWB holster, was there sufficient material to close the vest. It was noted that much like the Gunfighter Flannel Jacket, the Gunvent™ zippers would inadvertently open from the bottom if the sides of the vest were slightly pulled. Again, this is a common problem with other fleece and light jackets with a similar side opening, and one resolved by having a covering material (secured via snap button) over the bottom of the zipper to secure it as well as reinforce the closure. Viktos may want to consider that as an improvement in its next Gunvent™ design.
  • Weight Good (4/5): Extremely lightweight, the use of the Thermolite as an insulation later allowed the Zerodark™ vest to weigh in at 13.7 ounces while still maintaining the core temperature without excessive bulk. The Zerodark™ vest was even light enough, that Viktos added a loop behind the collar by which to hang the vest to dry when wet. For tactical vests of this type, the market runs the gambit in both material and design (of various weight reflecting those factors). For instance, 5.11’s Peninsula Insulator Vest (16.8 ounces) runs the more traditional design, similar to the Zerodark™ vest with its insulation, pockets, and a quick access sides. Whereas in comparison, the Arc’teryx Atom LT Vest (7.8 ounces) is a more minimalist design we few pockets and intended more to serve as a base layer in conjunction with other outer garments. Regardless, the Zerodark™ vest was still one of the lightest vests available that offers insulation and some level of tactical function. Viktos could likely add additional reinforcement stitching to key areas without significant increases to the product’s weight.

Overall Rating – Above Average (17/25)

Product Link: https://www.viktos.com/collections/outerwear/products/zerodark-vest

IMG_2889_TackenbergI am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.


Vortex Spitfire HD GEN II: Compact But Powerful

Released for 2021, the Spitfire HD Gen II is the latest iteration of the Vortex line of rifle and carbine powered optics. It offers powered magnification, and Vortex’s classic ranged donut reticle for distance shooting that gives the user a broad range of application. With its other features, the Spitfire HD Gen II is one of the most compact powered optics available.

The exterior chassis of the Spitfire HD Gen II is made from a single piece of aluminum, resulting in a shock-proof housing that withstands recoil or impact. The outer layer of the chassis is then hard-coat anodized in a matte black to provide the shooter with a low-glare surface.

Both lenses in the Spitfire HD Gen II are sealed in multiple anti-reflective coatings that maximize clarity. In addition, both rubberized endcaps to the optic can be folded over and attached to the optic’s body for storage, or completely removed if desired. The Spitfire HD Gen II uses Vortex’s HD Optical System to deliver high-quality resolution with minimal chromatic aberration and extreme edge sharpness. Finally, the internal space is purged with nitrogen gas and sealed with rubberized, waterproof O-rings to prevent moisture penetration and cut down fogging in any extreme temperature.

The Spitfire HD Gen II comes in two models (one in a x3 magnification and another in x5) with each featuring a donut-style reticle, with bullet drop compensator markings for holdover up to 650 yards that make it ideal for the 5.56 cartridge. The reticle has 12 intensity settings (with the lowest two compatible for night vision devices) and runs off a single CR 2032 battery.

The Spitfire HD Gen II comes with variable-height mounts (lower 1/3 Co-Witness and Low-Height) and a T-10 Torx Multi-Tool.


  • Magnification……………………x3 or x5 (model dependent)
  • Objective Lens Diameter……25 mm
  • Eye Relief………………………….3.7 inches
  • Field of View……………………..23.3 feet/100 yds
  • Adjustment Graduation……..1 MOA
  • Max Elevation Adjustment…200 MOA
  • Max Windage Adjustment….200 MOA
  • Parallax Setting…………………100 yds
  • Length………………………………3.6 inches
  • Weight………………………………10.3 oz

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • Cost – Fair (2/5): With an initial MSRP of $649 (for the x5 magnification), the SPITFIRE HD is a continuation of the previous variant optic with two variable magnification powers available. This gives the end-user the availability to choose which optic best suits their needs. With the added features of an illumination reticle, ruggedized housing, and variable height mounts, the SPITFIRE HD GEN II offers a lot in a package smaller than most with similar magnification. In comparison, market alternatives would include the x5 Cross Dot Reticle Scope ($385) from Barska, the AR-536 Red Dot Optic ($399) from Burris, or the T332 ($735) from Steiner that all place the SPITFIRE HD GEN II at the upper end of similar market optics with the same magnification, and a fair price for its function and design.
  • Comfort – Good (4/5): The SPITFIRE HD GEN II easily mounted and felt secure throughout the evaluation period, thanks in part to its picatinny rail mount using two Torx screws to lock itself in. The reticle brightness easily adjusted via the + and – marked buttons on the left side, but the buttons themselves did not have a tactile feel when depressed (something that would have been nice). Both the windage and elevation adjustment dials provided crisp and solid adjustments per MOA and it was easy to zero the optic. The optic glass itself was remarkably clear and the retile was bright and well defined, with the darkened reticle also being visible when the illumination brightness was turned off. The optic’s 25mm objective lens gave a larger, more comfortable field of view for the shooter (when the eye was positioned close enough – but more on that in the Function section below).
  • Durability – Excellent (5/5): With the SPITFIRE HD GEN II’s single piece chassis, O-ring gasket seals, and anodizing, it all ensured the optic was able to function regardless of impact, temperature, or moisture encountered on the range. The anodized surface proved very durable and resisted abrasion to a good degree, with only minor surface marring noted from contact with the ground or barricades. Through it all the dot held zero and did not drift despite various stressor and rifle drills. But one of the areas Vortex shines over its competitors is its no-questions-asked Vortex VIP Warrantee where if the optic becomes damaged accidentally at any time, they will replace it (although they will want to hear the story). 
  • Functionality – Average (3/5): Functionally the use of the SPITFIRE HD GEN II was straightforward. Press/hold the + for ON and press/hold the – for three seconds for OFF. The buttons themselves were large enough to be comfortable but not overwhelming. The intensity levels were clear with the higher being the most optimal for outdoor use, and the lowest two optimal for night vision use. One feature the SPITFIRE HD GEN II had that was a nice additive was an automatic shutoff to prevent battery drain that kicked in after 14 hours of inactivity. One element noted during use was the focal point of the optic’s rear lens is very short, almost to the point of being uncomfortable. The optic itself had to be mounted to the extreme rear of the rail (almost to the point where a bill of a ballcap was touching it) to attain a usable position with a full field of view, and this is something Vortex may want to look into resolving. Traditionally, many powered optics do not have this shallow of a focal point. The only purpose for this design would be for the use of an additional magnifier that would be placed behind the optic, so it is something the end-user should be aware of.
  • Weight – Good (4/5): Weighing in at 10.3 ounces (for the x5 magnification variant), the SPITFIRE HD GEN II is several ounces less than its predecessor (most likely attributable to the compact design and battery difference). But the optic itself was neither distracting in weight nor unbalancing to the rifle during function. In contrast, the x5 Cross Dot Reticle Scope (19.2 ounces) from Barska, the AR-536 Red Dot Optic (18.75 ounces) from Burris, or the T332 (14.2 ounces) from Steiner all illustrate the light weight of the SPITFIRE HD GEN II in comparison to older optics with similar magnification and give the Vortex optic a very good weight for its design and materials.

Overall Rating – Above Average (18/25)

Product Link: https://vortexoptics.com/spitfire-hd-gen-ii-5x-prism-scope.html

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Viktøs Wartorn Pants: For Maximum Flexability on the Range

Released in early 2022, the Wartorn Pant by Viktos advances the previous Contractor trouser design by bringing in additional utility features while keeping the same level of durability. The Wartorn Pant is made using Viktos’ Combatgrade™ stretch cotton/nylon chassis that provides improved comfort as well as function. 

Starting at the waist, the Wartorn Pant has seven 3” wide beltloops (four in the front and three in the back) with a padded waistband and patterned stitch line. These features improve comfort when wearing a heavy tactical belt, and have extensive bartack at stress points to maintain durability of the materials. The cut of the Wartorn Pant is slightly bowed due to the articulation slits at the knees and added joist material. This also accounts for deep knee movements common with life on the range or in the field.

At the top, the Wartorn Pant has a button and dual-shuttle YKK zipper fly with excess material under the zipper to protect the more sensitive skin areas from any accidental pinching. This unique design also allows the zipper to function while continuing to wear a duty or gun belt, and not requiring the wearer to remove it.

The two front pockets are a deep slash and angle pattern, with additional bartack and double line stitching for reinforcement, and a secondary pocket to account for retention clip items (such as pocket knives). The Viktos “Unconquered” branding appears on the interior of the front right pocket.

At mid-thigh is a multi-use cargo pocket with two slotted pockets behind the main pocket for full-size magazines (one rifle, one pistol) and one EDC tool (flashlight). The 8” (W) x 12” (H) cargo pocket itself is snap-button secured.

The two rear pockets are 7” wide each and open-ended at the top to allow immediate access when needed.

The knee segments and a crotch gusset are articulated, that incorporate Viktos’ Attackposture™ design, a four-way, flexible panel that provides maximum flexibility to accommodate a variety of shooting stances.

At each knee is an expansion panel for added articulation. Internally, each knee segment is slotted on the inside for knee padding (not included). Behind each knee, a hook-and-loop adjustment strap allows for custom tapering above the end-user’s calf.

Each pant cuff is single line stitched for added reinforcement, and to prevent/limit any fraying or compromise to the material.

The Wartorn Pant comes in Ranger Green (featured), Black, and Coyote. Its sizing runs from a 28” waist to 44” and an inseam from 30” to 36”.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • Cost – Average (3/5): With its MSRP of $115, the Wartorn Pant is an attempt to bridge a functional range/field pant with hallmark features found on other “operator” type trousers. This includes internal knee pad slots, hook-and-loop straps, and a padded waist line. For the price, users get a very durable and functional set of trousers for the range (even if that range includes rock, mud, or sand). In contrast, Crye is the defacto “king” of trousers in this design type and those run between $214 and $273. Alternatively, Direct Action’s Vanguard ($199 USD) trousers are an appropriate comparator, as would be UF Pro’s Striker ($199 USD) trousers, or Massif’s Combat Pant ($275). Obviously there are innumerable market alternatives that are less expensive, such as the 24×7 ($63.95) by Tru-Spec, or the HLX ($59.99) by Propper, but these were trousers that did not have similarities in materials, stitching, or design to the Wartorn. Among the market, this gave the Wartorn Pant an appropriate (or average) level of affordability when considering what it brings to the table.
  • Comfort – Good (4/5): Worn over a period of 30 days for several iterations on the range, and in a variety of stressors, the Wartorn Pant remained extremely flexible and comfortable. While often the gusset is the point where trousers bind in more dynamic movements, the Wartorn had a sufficient oversized gusset to allow for a wide range of motion, as did the Attackposture™ material (which appeared to be a four-way elastic type of nylon) included in the yolk and across the waist of the trousers. Likewise, the expandable slits just above the knee gave the Wartorn a good deal of flex when taking a knee or bringing the leg up into the chest. It would have been of benefit had the Wartorn had similar adjustment straps at the waistline as well. One notable feature for comfort was the padded waistline; filled with a thin layer of open-cell foam, it was extremely comfortable against a duty or range belt and more so against the skin during dynamic movements. Additionally, the ability to add padding to the knees could enhance the comfort of the Wartorn over rough terrain, although it did not come with any neoprene pads nor does Viktos offer any, so the end-user will be on their own to find a pair that fits. The Wartorn does run true-to-fit, so users will need to remember their actual body measurement when ordering and not at other sizes that may vary between manufacturers.
  • Durability – Good (4/5): The Wartorn was made from a cotton/nylon blend that gave the trousers an average level of durability and stiffness for their intended purpose. The conditions the trousers were tested against included water, mud, rock, and on concrete and aside from usual wear – the material retained an appropriate level or abrasion resistance. The trousers were put through four wash cycles and no fraying or loose threading of material was noted. Closer examination revealed that the Wartorn had a high degree of bartack stitching (though not as much as the Contractor series) along the belt line and high-stress points – with double-line stitching on pockets, and crotch gusset. These features all ensured that there was no compromise of the stitching or material during dynamic movement, and if it were to ever become so then it would be limited to the affected area. The only concern was the plastic button anchored at the top of the fly, as it was only secured by a single band of nylon. Under hard usage, similar buttons retained in the same manner can become ripped off by gear or simply broken. A recommendation to Viktos in future designs would be to consider changing the button to a metal snap-type, or a hook-and-loop tab similar to the knee adjustment straps for added strength and stand less chance of being shorn off.
  • Functionality – Excellent (5/5): From a functional aspect, the Wartorn had a large degree of application for those who live a regular life on the range. The number of pockets on the Wartorn were extremely useful, and most pockets easily accommodated a rifle or pistol magazine. It was noted during evals the multi-use cargo pockets on the thigh allowed for additional storage/access, leaving the traditional side pockets available for flatter items or accessories. The fly itself had two shuttles on the same zipper, so there was a good convenience factor with no need in undoing the range/battle belt if visiting the restroom. A good deal of the Wartorn’s functionality was put into making it comfortable while worn for an extensive amount of time (4+ hours) and regardless of conditions. Aspects like the Attackposture segments, articulation joints, and tapered design all allowed for full range of motion regardless of the setting. Finally, the hook-and-loop knee adjustment straps did a good job at cinching excess material around the lower leg to provide a more customized fit to the overall trouser and individual.
  • Weight – Average (3/5): Weighing in at 1.64 pounds the Wartorn had a good amount of blended cotton and nylon fabric, with an appropriate amount of room for movement through the waist and upper thigh of the trouser. While extensive reinforcement stitching was noted, it was neither excessive nor cumbersome. In contrast, the weight of market alternatives noted included the Crye Gen 3 (1.6 pounds), the Vanguard (1.32 pounds), UF Pro’s Striker (2.09 pounds), and the Massif’s Combat Pant (2.0 pounds). All of which places the Wartorn Pant are of an average weight amid the market of alternatives and for the materials chosen.

Overall Rating – Above Average (19/25)

Product Link: https://www.viktos.com/collections/pants/products/wartorn-pant

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via High Ground Media, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

HRT Arc Belt: New Design, Lighter Materials

Released in 2022, and using new Tegris materials, the Arc Belt by HRT Tactical provides the end-user with all the essential elements necessary be it in a professional or practical use, field, or competition.

Deconstructed down into its respective components, a complete Arc Belt (AB) comprises of an inner belt, outer belt, and its corresponding HRT pouches. Together they offer a complete belt package that is ready to perform.

Inner Belt

The AB can be configured at the time of purchase with two different types of inner belts; the first being the Arc Tegris Inner Belt that is 1½” wide, and has a Tegris inner core with partial-wrap  of continual hook-and-loop (female) material the length of the inner belt. The Arc Tegris Inner Belt also uses a simple hook-and-loop overlap to secure the belt, whereby the overall belt is threaded through the belt loops of the worn trousers. Use of the Arc Tegris Inner Belt allows for independent use as a daily wear when the outer Arc Belt is not needed—but can be readily attached when/if desired.

Product Link: https://hrttacticalgear.com/product/hrt-arc-tegris-inner-belt/

Alternatively, the second type of inner belt (if selected and not included in this review) is the Arc Inner Belt. It uses an inner pad made from non-overlapping closed-cell foam (wrapped in a suede material) and cut to the same length as the outer belt. The Arc Inner Belt also does not include a buckle, but instead utilizes a G-Hook buckle to cinch the belt secure. When using the Arc Inner Belt, the overall platform has a ready-use application whereby the outer belt can be immediately donned without necessitating use of the trouser belt loops.

Product Link: https://hrttacticalgear.com/product/hrt-arc-inner-belt/

Outer Belt

The outer belt of the AB is the workhorse to the overall platform, and one which all accessories can be mounted. It is 1 7/8” wide, and made from Tegris—a type of thermoplastic that incorporates carbon fiber for added strength while adding none of the excess weight. The HRT Arc Belt is reversible (for either left or right-handed shooters), contoured to fit the dimensions of the hip, and laser cut in sections to create the MOLLE-compatible segments that run most of the belt’s exterior. Around the core Tegris material are two sleeves made from laminate nylon (with a respective abrasion rating at approximately 1000D).

The Tegris core material slides behind the supportive outer belt sleeves, and then secured at the front. The HRT Arc Belt is secured at the front with an aluminum G-Hook Belt Buckle (but can be upgraded to an AustriAlpin 1” Cobra Buckle).

On the interior of the HRT Arc Belt is a 1 ½” wide band of continual, skin-safe hook-and-loop (male) material that is used to immediately connect the belt to either the Arc Tegris Inner Belt (when worn as a regular trouser belt) or the Arc Inner Belt (when attached prior to use).

Product Link: https://hrttacticalgear.com/product/hrt-arc-belt/


The rifle and pistol pouches selected by HRT for the AB system have an outer shell of laminate nylon, with injection-molded inserts inside the pouch. The inserts themselves are flared at the opening to assist in rehoming magazines, and angled to ensure a continual opening of the pouch. Additionally, the pistol magazine is available separately as a single, angled pouch for those who prefer those style of setups.

Product Link: https://hrttacticalgear.com/product-category/first-line/

Securing the Hardware

The magazine pouches for the outer AB utilize HRT’s Rigid MOLLE Strip, which are made entirely from Tegris, and are flexible enough to be threaded between the MOLLE-spaced segments of the outer belt, to secure each individual pouch via pass-through tab.

Assisting Instructional Videos

To assist owners in understanding the Arc Belt, Tegris, and supportive hardware, HRT created the following videos:

The Arc Belt is available in a variety of color combinations to include: Ranger Green (featured), Multicam, Grey, and Black. It also is available in three waist size variations: Small-Medium (26”-36”), Medium-Large (32”-42”), and Large-XLarge (38”-48”).

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • CostExcellent (5/5): The cost of a complete Arc Belt does vary based on configuration made at the time of purchase. In this review, the configured belt would cost approximately $270, with the ability to be an all-inclusive setup providing everything the end-user would need. Taken individually, the components would otherwise cost the consumer the following:
    • Arc Belt ……….…………………$124.95
    • 1” Cobra Buckle………………$29.95
    • Inner belt Pad…………………$24.50
    • Tigris Inner Belt………………$35.00
    • AR Pouch………………………..$26.95/ea.
    • Pistol Pouch……………………$18.95/ea.
    • 30-degree Pistol Adapter…$8.95
    • As such, market alternatives to an Arc Belt setup (complete) include the Assaulter’s Belt System ($366) from G-Code, the Urban Defender Package ($245.73) or Ultimate Operator Kit ($306) from Wilder Tactical, the HSGI Rigger’s Belt (configured to match $509), and the TYR Tactical Gunfighter Belt Kit (configured to match $409) illustrate the HRT Arc Belt remains an excellent value for its materials used, function, and durability.
  • ComfortAverage (3/5): In its evaluated configuration; the inner and outer belt were adjustable enough to find an individualized and comfortable fit—yet still had an extensive amount of excess material within the identified waist range. The curvature of the belts themselves contoured more naturally to the flared dimensions of the hip than traditional linear belts (thus mitigating potential Meralgia Paresthetica issues). Otherwise, the overlapping Arc Belt (and inner belt) made for a very solid and comfortable platform that neither shifted in weight, sagged, nor slipped in hardware despite multiple stressor drills (lunges, squats, sprints). The weight of loaded magazines had no observed negative effect to the magazine pouches themselves, or strain/sag on the beltline, and the rigidity of the Tegris material in both the inner and outer belt prevented any folding or roll, and provided good overall structure around the shooter’s waist. A large negative detractor to the overall comfort to the Arc Belt, and a point of recommended improvement for HRT, is the exposed edges to the Tegris material itself. To cut the blended thermoplastic and carbon fiber material, a laser must be used to cut/melt and heat-seal the edges to prevent incidental fraying or wear. But the melted Tegris then hardens into a very rough and abrasive edge. This would otherwise not be an issue wrapped inside the hook-and-loop or outer belt sleeves, but exposed Tegris edges were still present (along the bottom edge of the inner belt, and the back-half of the outer belt) and incidental contact was still abrasive against the hand (such as when reaching for an IFAK) and against exposed skin. After releasing the Arc Belt, HRT did later release additional single-rear Arc Belt sleeves to enclose any exposed Tegris material on the back of the outer Arc Belt, but considering the design, HRT may want to consider including those with the belt itself or the consumer should consider adding it at the time of purchase.
  • DurabilityExcellent (5/5): The Arc Belt lent itself to an excellent degree of durability given the characteristics of Tegris to remain light and resistant to abrasion, while sacrificing none of its inherent strength. Moreover, the outer belt sleeves were made from a laminate nylon that often has an abrasion rating of 1000D, and resisted a high degree of friction despite multiple stressor drills or settings. Tegris is a (relatively) new material being integrated into tactical products to provide structure and support, and well known for its low profile and carbon fiber strength. Thus, the pouches and associated hardware that utilize the Tegris in both the inner belt and outer for support, and interlocking bands, ensured it all remained locked in place throughout. The outer belt sleeves had some bartack stitching at corners and key stress points that added to some degree of overall durability to the system. The AustriAlpin 1” Cobra Buckle mechanism continually had a solid lock, and ensured the belt stayed secure regardless of body movement.
  • FunctionalityGood (4/5): From a functional aspect, the Arc Belt as a complete belt system held a very good purpose in design, with customizable sizing and magazine pouches that gave positive retention, and smooth rehoming. The ability of the Tegris core (of the outer belt) to slide inside and behind the outer sleeve allowed the end-user to find a custom sizing that best fit their comfort and usage (something of benefit on hotter days). There was a large amount of excess Tegris material for the sizing (a 40” waist), but that was likely due to the fact the sizing of the belt reviewed encompasses two sizing categories (both Large and XLarge) totaling 10” in size difference. However, because of the Tegris properties and spacing/design, this excess can never be trimmed (to do so will lose the tapered end needed to thread the outer belt into the opposing outer sleeve, or compromise the Tegris edges itself). Those on the smaller size of HRT’s sizing scale may want to carefully consider moving down one size and avoid that excess. The Tegris inner belt also provided a solid base, with good connection between the hook-and-loop fabric of the inner and outer belt, that yielded a solid base for the greater system when worn through belt loops, and no discernable pressure point while worn in conjunction with trousers due to the absence of any buckle. There was some minimal “drift” of the belt at the rear where the raw Tegris is exposed against the inner belt, as there was no hook-and-loop on the Tegris to secure it to the inner belt (again, something the inclusion of the added individual sleeves could prevent), but not excessive. Elsewhere, the flared opening to the inserts of the mag pouches did provide a smooth draw and rehoming of magazines, and held a high degree of retention – continuing to hold fully loaded rifle/pistol magazines despite the entire belt being shaken upside down for 10 seconds. Otherwise, the Arc Belt provided for a complete, ready-to-use range/duty belt system using high quality materials whereby the end-user could organize their belt’s design as desired (including angled pistol magazine pouches if desired).
  • WeightExcellent (5/5): The overall Arc Belt (as a complete system and w/o holster) weighed in at 1.16 pounds (17.7 ounces), and that relative light weight was directly due to the choice of Tegris as a core material and for use in its mounting hardware. Individually, each component weighed in at:
    • Arc Belt ……….…………………20 ounces
    • 1” Cobra Buckle………………1.8 ounces
    • Tigris Inner Belt………………2.4 ounces
    • AR Pouch………………………..2.3 ounces
    • Pistol Pouch……………………1.0 ounce
    • 30-degree Pistol Adapter…1.0 ounce
    • In contrast, a similarly configured kit by HSGI (3.5 pounds), Assaulter’s Belt System (3.15 pounds) by G-Code, or TYR Tactical (3.8 pounds) are of mostly similar weight. This variance in weight can be attributed to use of blended materials, leg-drop design, and variances of reinforced stitching present within each product. This left the Arc Belt as one of the lightest complete systems currently on the market, and excellent for the level of functionality it brings.

Overall Rating – Very Good (22/25)

Product Link: https://hrttacticalgear.com/product/hrt-arc-belt/

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via High Ground Media, LLC, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Streamlight Racker Forend Shotgun Light: For the Bump In the Night

Released for SHOT Show 2020, the Racker by Streamlight is a new edition for the company’s line of weapon mounted lights, and its first integrated design for the Mossberg 500/590 line of shotguns.

Intended as a drop-in replacement for the Mossberg’s forend, the custom light optic produces a focused beam with peripheral illumination that reaches 283 meters before dispersal.

In front of the optic, the Racker included Borofloat glass is designed to have a high degree of heat and impact/abrasion resistance.


The Racker’s integrated weapon light produces 1,000 lumens (20,000 candela) off of two CR123 batteries that give it 1.5 hours of run time.

Along both sides of the Racker, the 4.5” ambidextrous pressure switch allow the operator to select between momentary and continually on function.


The impact-resistant housing of the forend is almost 8” long and made from a polymer/nylon resin that provides ergonomic handling for the support hand.

The Racker is Mossberg compatible to the 7 3/4″ Action slide 500® and 590® series, or works with Remington 870s (with the exception of the Remington 870 Express Supermag).

With its sealed rubber gasket endcap and enclosed housing to provide waterproofing the Racker is IPX7 rated; waterproof for up to 30 minutes.

The Racker comes in Black (featured) and Orange.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • CostExcellent (5/5): Coming in at an MSRP of $225, the Racker is a larger, intergraded WML for the more common shotgun styles on the available market. With a light source throwing out 1k lumens, the Racker gives as much light output, or more as other long-gun weapon lights. The closest comparator would be Surefire’s line of forend lights for the Mossberg 500/590 ($399-$599) and Remington 870 shotguns ($399-$599). For a short time EOTech also did offer its Integrated Forend Light ($243.70) forend light, but has since discontinued it. Regardless, as technology has developed, Streamlight’s new Racker is an inexpensive alternative to Surefire’s dominance in the market for intergraded shotgun lights.
  • Comfort Average (3/5): For its textured grip and rigid chassis, the Racker proved to be a very comfortable fit in the support hand that, combined with the angled housing of the light module, served as a good hand stop by which to control the forend. The switch module ran nearly the full length of the grip; however, there wasn’t much of a raised or textured surface on the switch to delineate the tactile feel between that and the chassis. The result was sometimes having to look down to check the position of the thumb on the switch. A recommendation to Streamlight would be to improve the comfort of the switch would be to raise the switch’s surface into a rounded or rubberized feel.
  • Durability – Excellent (5/5): The ABS polymer housing of the Racker took a good beating yet never failed. The chassis was struck against the wooden frame of the nearby shooting bench five times each side (10 total strikes) before loading and firing the shotgun, and at no point did the material separate nor become compromised beyond minor surface marring. The light module itself remained firmly inside the chassis and it and the switch module continued to function as normal.
  • Functionality – Average (3/5): Functionally, the Racker was designed to be a drop-in replacement for the stock Mossberg forend while adding an integrated weapon light. Its installation was easy and straight forward; however, it would have been nice to have an included forend removal tool, similar to what was included with the Magpul MOE M-LOK forend replacement. Users should take care in ordering the correct Racker for the Mossberg line of shotguns as the 500/590 variant of the Racker (Part # 69600) is slightly different than the 590 Shockwave (##69602) Racker. The latter will still fit on the full-length 500/590, just with the chassis’ shorter overall length it required a spacer to accommodate for the difference. The 1,000 lumens thrown by the Racker made illumination of interior spaces very easy, with a solid central beam for getting into dark corners. The hand strap of the 590 Shockwave variant did not have any adjustability, and did little to secure the forend to the hand. The switch module did have a tangible feel to it that denoted the Racker’s ON/OFF operation. The battery endcap was a little tricky to remove because of its position/angle, but with a wide flat-end screwdriver it was removed to allow access for the CR123 batteries. The Racker did lack the “Safe ON/OFF” feature as found in its other pistol WMLs, such as the TLR-7 and would have made for a nice feature. All of these gave the Racker an appropriate (or average) score with some room for improvement in function.
  • Weight Excellent (5/5): Depending on the model selected (the Mossberg 500®/590® weighed in at 10.78 oz. while the Remington 870 will weigh in at 11.08 oz.). The weight will vary due to the overall size of the chassis and associated ABS polymer. The switch and light modules are the same in both versions and thus had the same mass. In comparison, the DSF-500/590 forend replacement from Surefire (with 600 lumens) weighed approximately 18.2 ounces and its heavier mass is due to the thicker chassis and rubberized features for added grip. When in production, the IFL from EOTech (with 250 lumens) weighed 12.2 ounces and with its integrated light and design was a closer approximation of Streamlight’s Racker. However, in both alternatives the Racker (with 1,000 lumens) was still the lighter option and demonstrated the excellent lightweight design with current LED technology to deliver superior light output.

Overall Rating – Good (21/25)

Product Link: https://www.streamlight.com/products/detail/index/tl-racker

IMG_2889_TackenbergI am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.


RMA 1155 Ballistic Plate: Quality Protection at an Affordable Price

Nestled in among the rolling corn fields of Centerville, Iowa is a body armor manufacturer that has been gaining in popularity over the last year thanks to its quality ceramic body armor at an affordable price for civilians. RMA Armament counts among its products the 1155 Model Hard Body Armor, an NIJ Certified Level IV (NIJ 0101.06) ceramic plate that can withstand most of today’s common threats.

The 1155 is in the industry standard of a 10” (W) x 12” (H) x 1” (D) plate dimension, and comes with the associated SAPI/ESAPI style cut that allows for more opening in the shoulder pocket and range of motion. The plate has a single vertical curve to allot for standard male upper torso curvatures.

The plate itself is of a standard monolithic aluminum oxide ceramic core, with a polyethylene backer that enables the plate to sustain multiple hits. Around the plate, RMA uses a 600D water-resistant nylon cover to help mitigate heat and moisture from the upper body.

As with all of its products, the RMA 1155 is made entirely in the USA. The 1155 Hard Body Armor plate itself is available in only in Black, although RMA does offer the 1155 separately with a “Back the Blue” logo on it in lieu of the RMA logo.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • Cost – Excellent (5/5): RMA offers ballistic protection at a variety of levels and cost ratios. The set of two, NIJ Certified, Level IV 1155s is currently listed on RMA’s website as $270 although it also does offer individual plates at $135 per plate. The 1155s are a single curve and made of the more readily used ceramic materials found in much of the industry. In contrast, market alternatives to the 1155s include anything from a set of the Level IV Hercules ($550) from Spartan Armor Systems, a set of Level IV 4601 ($467) from Hesco, or a set of Level IV Triple Curve (Model # 26605) ($539) from Hoplite Armor. All of which places the 1155s at an excellent price point amid its competitors which all share a similar NIJ certification level.
  • Comfort – Average (3/5): Comfort wise, the 1155s had only a singular curve that accommodated the vertical curvature of the upper torso comfortable and appropriately for the male physique. Females may still find this curvature uncomfortable due to variances in upper body type. Perhaps the most notable effect to comfort on the 1155s was the weight (as noted below), as worn for longer durations (1hr. +) it became very apparent in the shoulders and lower lumbar region despite the use of a quality carrier for evaluations. This was the tradeoff for having an affordable plate with the same protective ratings as more expensive brands, using the more commonly available ceramics. With its 1” thickness, the 1155s also had an appropriate (or average) profile off the torso and (properly sized for the individual) the corners did not poke or gouge unnecessarily. The inclusion of padding/buffer around the core ceramic material also added to the comfort, ensuring that no hard edges/angles were felt despite dynamic movements.
  • Durability – Average (3/5): Obviously the durability of ballistic plates lies in that they perform to a known (and consistent) standard (even as a minimum). The 1155’s are NIJ Level IV Certified to stop projectiles at under 3200fps, or as the NIJ tests for—a single hit form a 30-06 AP round. Assuming the end-user does nothing that would otherwise compromise the integrity of the plats, the 1155’s should withstand time. RMA does offer a 10 year manufacturer’s warranty with all its ballistic plates, so they do support their product and its performance for the appropriate (or average) timeframe as other manufacturers. As noted in our editorial series on body armor, the warranty merely reflects the manufacturer’s interest to support the customer while still ensuring performance. Ceramic doesn’t “expire” in the sense that it degrades just over time and usage, but 10 years is pretty average for what manufacturers are willing to ensure the product for. Added to the durability of the 1155s was a padded/buffer layer to the edges and front/back side of the plates. This was to aid in drop protection and avoid the ceramic from cracking (although most modern ceramics are very durable) if accidentally dropped. One issue noted from a durability aspect was the nylon cover around the plates had some cuts/holes in the material upon receipt. This was merely cosmetic, and did not fray further during evaluation while in the carrier, but something the consumer should be aware of due to the thin layer of material itself.
  • Functionality – Good (4/5): As noted, the 1155’s are NIJ Certified and readily found in the CPL, which means the RMA plates themselves have already been submitted to the most stringent of scientific testing and evaluation, thus passed in good order. Therefore, the plates will functionally protect the end user up to a specific rated velocity (in the case of 1155’s Level IV), to include those readily found in some of the most common rifle and pistol calibers. As such, there is little that could be done to the plates for evaluation on function (such as submersion/soak testing, drop-testing, and ballistic testing) that hasn’t already been performed and well documented. It is the position of STL Shooting Enthusiasts that “backyard destructive testing” is neither a scientific nor credible means to evaluate body armor, specifically if the plates themselves are already NIJ Certified. Such means could provide a glimpse into the performance of the armor to a degree—but not one that could be considered reliable due to variances on ammo velocities, projectile materials, and even ambient air temperature.
  • Weight – Fair (2/5): At 8.3 pounds per plate, the 1155s were notably heavier than other plates that utilize more advanced and lighter materials. The weight of each 1155 is directly attributed to the ceramic composite material, which have sufficient density to defeat projectiles for the NIJ rated velocities stated. In contrast, a Level IV Hercules (6.9 pounds) from Spartan Armor Systems, a Level IV 4601 (6.4 pounds) from Hesco, or a Level IV Triple Curve (Model # 26605) (6.5 pounds) from Hoplite Armor all show that while the 1155s are the more inexpensive options, they are also one of the heavier and fair among the market of alternatives.

Overall Rating – Above Average (17/25)

Product Link: https://rmadefense.com/store/body-armor/level-iv/level-iv-hard-armor-plate-model-1155-set/

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Lead Devil USA Tactical Duty Belt: American Made For the Duty Professional

Building its belts from some of the toughest materials available, the 1.75” tactical duty belt by Lead Devil USA offers a rigid and functional two-piece belt system that allow for customization to fit any need.

Inner Belt

The Lead Devil tactical belt starts with a 1.75” wide inner EDC base belt made from the company’s proprietary Lead Devil Tactical Webbing (LDTW) nylon blend. This includes a nylon weave with a smooth inner facing side intended to pass through the belt loops of the trousers. This blend is then resin treated for greater strength and abrasion resistance. Sum total the nylon has a tensile strength upwards of 5,500 pounds per square inch.

The outward facing side of the inner belt includes Lead Devil’s low-profile unnapped (female) hook-and-loop material that, combined with the double layered Type 3 (male) hook-and-loop material of the outer belt, provides for maximum strength against sheer forces. The sizing of the inner belt is adjusted by a genuine AustriAlpin triglide EDC buckle with the excess capable of mating to the outer layer of the inner belt’s (female) hook-and-loop material for maximum comfort.

Outer Belt

The outer belt of the two-piece Lead Devil’s 1.75” tactical belt is where all the work happens. Made from the same LDTW nylon material as the inner belt, the outer belt features a number of elements that make it ideal for work, duty, or general training. Sizing is done through a 2.25” genuine AustriAlpin Cobra Prostyle belt buckle with any excess again folded over and secured on the outer belt’s exterior hook-and-loop material. This enables for the perfect fit in sizing with any excess secured rather than retained by an elastic cuff.

The exterior of the outer duty belt features two bands of ½” nylon, made from the same material as the outer belt and reinforced using bartack stitching into 0.25” Micro MOLLE-compatible sections. This pattern is repeated over ¾ the length of the outer belt to accommodate left or right-handed users, as well as most pouches or accessories. The outer belt also includes a hook-and-loop fastener that retains the attached D-ring when not in use.

Along the interior of the outer duty belt is a length of double layer Type 3 (male) hook-and-loop that thanks to its larger “hook” mates to the corresponding material on the inner EDC base belt for maximum retention. This also enables for the inner belt to be worn when the outer belt is not necessary, and the outer belt to be easily donned when needed.

Belt Specifications:

  • Small……..27” – 30”
  • Medium…31” – 34”
  • Large……..35” – 38”
  • XL………….39” – 42”
  • 2XL………..43” – 46”
  • 3XL………..47” – 50”

Lead Devil’s 1.75” Tactical Range Belt comes in an outer belt that includes OD Green (featured), Coyote, and Black. The inner belt color can be selected separately to correspond or be another of the other colors available.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • CostAverage (4/5): The 1.75” wide tactical duty belt by Lead Devil has a $164 (color dependent) starting price, which given its custom rigid LDTW nylon material solid hook-and-loop, and hardware, make the cost good in that its custom materials represents a significant amount of attention to custom design, quality, and function. In comparison, other notable manufacturers with products of similar design are the Delta Belt ($115) by Persec, the T3 Trident Operator Belt ($159.65), or the Ronin Senshi Belt (at upwards of $190) which some use off-the-shelf SCUBA/4088 webbing, or have regular hook-and-loop material. This all gave the tactical duty belt by Lead Devil a very good cost for its custom nylon and hook-and-loop materials, included two-part belt system, and genuine AustriAlpin hardware.
  • Comfort Good (4/5): Perhaps its greatest advantage in comfort, was the ability of the tactical belt to be easily adjusted for any fit needed before donning, or while worn. The inner EDC belt, with triglide buckle, allowed for easy adjustment when donning, and with any excess cinched and secured completely to the side. The outer belt also followed similar design by allowing the cobra buckle to be tightened as necessary and the excess secured to the side as well. As the outer tactical duty belt was worn, over time it loosened up a little from its out-of-box rigidity. But even after a 30-day trial period consisting of a number of shooting iterations, the belt still held a good level of rigidity due to the tightness in nylon weave pattern. This made it good for bearing the weight of pouches or accessories.
  • Durability – Excellent (5/5): Out of the box it was immediately evident to the durable qualities of Lead Devil’s tactical range belt. There was extensive bartack stitching throughout the inner and outer belts, as well as X-pattern reinforcement in key areas that added to its overall strength. Overall the LDTW nylon to both the inner and outer belt was very resistant to abrasion. Despite repetitive adjustment and readjustment, donning and removal, at no point during evaluation did any of the material separate or become compromised. Lead Devil does offer its Exchange Program which covers the belt against wear & tear, damage, maintenance, weight loss/gain for the lifetime of the purchaser.
  • Functionality Average (3/5): Functionally the tactical range belt was very straight forward, with its Micro MOLLE webbing serving as the ideal fit for most pouches and accessories. The inner EDC belt was a rigid nylon webbing that made daily wear comfortable while the triglide buckle allowed for easy and immediate adjustment. The outer belt was likewise easily donned and mated to the inner belt easily and consistently. The cobra belt buckle provided for an easy and audible lock, and retained a solid lock throughout. As a stand-alone belt, a recommendation to Lead Devil that could have improved the tactical range belt’s overall score in function would be the inclusion of features on the outer belt that allow for expansion of the outer belt’s operational role; such as loops for suspenders, or a glove loop.
  • Weight Average (3/5): The size of the belt and materials used often determines the volume of overall mass for the tactical range belt, as well as the amount of reinforcement. In this evaluation a Large was reviewed and held an overall weight of 1.38 pounds. This included the weight of the two-part nylon belt system, with its extensive reinforced stitching and Micro MOLLE webbing, and both AustriAlpin buckles. In comparison the Persec Delta (1.3 pounds), T3 Trident Operator Belt (1.27 pounds), and the Ronin TF Belt (1.2 pounds) all demonstrate that the choice of hardware is often the deciding factor in as little a difference in ounces. In the selection of Lead Devil’s tactical range belt, the minimal heavier weight over its competitors is directly related to Lead Devil’s choice of using genuine AustriAlpin hardware, the extensive bartack and reinforcement stitching throughout, and the density to the nylon weave for the LDTW material. The result is an appropriate (or average) score, and if Lead Devil could develop a way to shed 10 ounces from the overall design then it would score higher amid its competitors.

Overall Rating – Above Average (19/25)

Product Link: https://www.leaddevilusa.com/tactical/tactician-belt-rb2ne

IMG_2889_TackenbergI am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.


G-Code Firebase: Good for the Grip

Introduced in 2022 as a magazine enhancement, the Firebase by G-Code provides the end user with increased surface area for control, and a textured non-slip base for support when needed.

Made from a rubberized polymer, each Firebase (sold in pairs) measures 2.75” (L) x 1” (W) x 2” (H). The Firebase is designed to accommodate a majority of the most popular magazine brands.

With its flexible 1/16” thick sidewalls, the Firebase slips over the bottom of a rifle magazine, giving it an improved texture for tactile control.

A reinforced base with a textured exterior allows the end user to comfortably rest the base of a magazine on a variety of surfaces without concern of slippage.

The Firebase is available in Ranger Green (featured), Black, and Coyote.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • CostAverage (3/5): At $24.95 for a pack of two; the Firebase is made from a flexible, rubberized polymer similar to many common non-slip devices. The Firebase is compatible to many common types of magazines, and assists in supporting the rifle when needed. In contrast, similar types of alternative magazine support bases (that don’t add additional round count) includes the Base Plate ($19.95) by Mag-Pod, Ranger Plates for PMags ($24.95) from Magpul, and the aluminum Ranger Baseplate ($45.00) by Lockstep Arms. This demonstrates the diversity in design and materials amid the market of magazine accessories (separate from the versions that add additional round count), and place the Firebase at an appropriate (or average) cost amid the overall market.
  • Comfort Good (4/5): From a comfort aspect, the Firebase slipped on the magazine’s base easily, and didn’t come off unless so desired and pulled off. This was thanks in part to the flexible sides that created a slight suction effect to keep the Firebase in place. When attached, the textured base of the Firebase mitigated any accidental slippage of the magazine when a support platform or bench was being used. Additionally, by increasing the surface area of the magazine’s base, it made grasping the magazine from pouches, belts, or plate carrier easier and more readily tactile. Those using a “beer can” grip for magazines would find the Firebase an added benefit while manipulating between magazines.
  • Durability – Good (4/5): The durability of the Firebase was aided by the polymer material, that was the same blended material as popular magazines. This gave the Firebase a good degree of durability and flexibility to resist impact and abuse. Over the course of field use, only surface marring and other marks were encountered but at no point did the material become torn, weathered, or cracked. It is most likely over time the Firebase would take on similar exterior wear as PMags and other polymer accessories, but would continue to function as intended for the long-term. Perhaps the greatest risk would be over extreme usage the non-slip textured surface on the base may become gouged, but this would be consistent to heavy usage.
  • Functionality Good (4/5): Functionally the Firebase offered a simplistic advantage, with its textured magazine base preventing inadvertent slippage while at a bench or over a barricade despite recoil. The Firebase also provided a larger surface area in which to grip on when pulling the magazine out of the pouch. The triangular structure of the base’s interior illustrated the reinforcement and durability of the Firebreak over long-term usage. The principle focus of the Firebase was to improve tactile control, and offer support to the rifle while at rest. Perhaps the only limiting factor to the Firebase is that it is not sold individually or combo packs of three (a consistent number to magazines pouches on plate carriers). It would be recommended to G-Code to consider a 3-pack offering of the Firebase as well.
  • Weight Excellent (5/5): Each individual Firebase weighed in at just 30 grams, which was negligible considering the overall weight to a rifle and other mounted accessories. The Firebase owed much of its light weight to the offset in design whereby the supporting base was a latticework of space-saving triangular supports rather than a solid structure, allowing the design to add thickness to the supportive walls while not becoming burdensome. In contrast, the Base Plate (60 grams) by Mag-Pod, Ranger Plates for PMags (113 grams) from Magpul, and the aluminum Ranger Baseplate (77 grams) by Lockstep Arms demonstrate the lightweight characteristics of the Firebase’s materials, and make it one of the lighter support bases available on the current market.

Overall Rating – Good (20/25)

Product Link: https://www.tacticalholsters.com/product/firebase/-1196

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via High Ground Media, LLC, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Lancer Systems L5AWM Magazine: Strength Where It Counts

Released circa 2013, the L5AWM is a 30-round capacity rifle magazine by Lancer Systems for a variety of Colt-patterned ARs. The L5AWM gives users a blended design with stainless steel feed lips for strength, and a polymer body for minimal weight.

As a whole, the L5AWM body is made from impact/stain resistant polymer rated to perform in extreme environmental conditions (40F to +180F).


Starting at the top, the L5AWM’s hybrid body begins with a hardened steel feed lip assembly. This assembly is molded to the upper magazine and not removable. It also greatly strengthens the upper tower of the magazine’s body from excessive impacts from the bolt in full-auto or when running suppressors. The L5AWM also features an anti-tilt, self-lubricating follower and stainless steel spring that ensure consistent feeding of ammunition. Slots at the rear of the steel lip assembly help seat stripper clips guides to speed in the loading of ammunition.

The L5AWM has a consistent curve throughout the length of the magazine to aid in reliable function. The bottom half of the magazine has a raised magazine stop line and ribbed grip surface along the exterior surfaces for tactile improved control. The L5AWM comes in a variety of clear and translucent options, each with 20- and 30-round count markings that enable for full-length and immediate visual recognition of ammo count.

At the bottom, the removable polymer floorplate is separated from the interior base plate using a round or similar pointed object to release the locking mechanism. The floorplates also include optional drain holes for those working in maritime operations.

The L5AWM magazine is only available in a Translucent Smoke (featured), Translucent Clear, Translucent Dark Earth, Opaque Black, and Opaque FDE.


  • Compatible with M4/M16/AR15, SCAR16, HK416, ARX160, SIG556, ARC, SIG MCX, IWI Tavor, IWI X95, SA80, chambered in 5.56x45mm / .223 Remington.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • CostAverage (3/5): Priced between $16.30 – $21.99 (color dependent), the cost of the L5AWM reflects not only the materials, but uniqueness of its optional clear or translucent body. In addition, the L5AWM is one of the few hybrid polymer magazines with a stainless steel feed lip that brings forward the best of both magazine types. When placed in comparison to other market magazines; the Series 2 ($14.99 – $16.99) by Hexmag, or the Gen2 MOE ($15.95) and Gen3 ($17.95) by Magpul Industries, appear on the higher scale of cost against straight polymer magazines. But in relation to full stainless steel magazines, the price (depending on vendor and quality) can run approx. $16/per with no option for a clear or translucent body. So, it becomes a balancing decision on the part of the consumer where the materials and function of the L5AWM is appropriate (or average) in relation to its cost.
  • Comfort Excellent (5/5): The L5AWM was used for a period of 30 days in various training iterations, and what stood out the most for its comfort was the notable stainless-steel spring, which felt stiffer and held more potential energy than other magazines. This gave the follower a positive and consistent pressure against the ammunition and thus, a solid feeding into the chamber. The translucent sidewalls allowed for immediate recognition of ammo count in light environments or outdoors, and was aesthetically appealing as well. As an AR magazine in general, the L5AWM magazine was as comfortable in the hand as other polymer-based magazine on the market. The robust contour features gave a solid tactile feel over the entire bottom half of the magazine regardless if the shooter was wearing gloves or not. This helped in stripping the magazine out, driving it home into the magwell, or with manipulation in/out of pouches.
  • Durability – Good (4/5): The biggest positive aspect to the durability to the L5AWM magazines laid in the polymer’s resiliency (or the ability of the polymer to flex and then return to its pre-determined shape). The sidewalls appeared to be slightly thinner in comparison to Magpul’s Gen3 magazines, but the reinforced gripping surface of the L5AWM added additional thickness along key areas. Three drop tests to several fully-loaded L5AWM magazines were conducted from a height of approx. six feet, with the feed ramps down in an attempt to get a direct strike. In each iteration, despite striking a concrete surface, only 1-2 rounds were typically ejected and the feed lips or follower were never compromised beyond simple surface marring. Internet research did find at least one example in 2016 of the L5AWM’s polymer follower being damaged during drop testing due to the front end shearing off—and it would be recommended to Lancer to consider bolstering the follower. Other examples demonstrated people driving over the L5AWM with no adverse effects. It should be noted, much like many other polymer-based products, users should avoid prolonged direct UV exposure to the L5AWM in that it may affect the molecular resiliency of the product (i.e. becomes brittle).
  • Functionality Excellent (5/5): From a functional aspect, the biggest positive feature of the L5AWM was its hardened steel feed lip assembly. There was plenty of documented examples of use in the field and on the range, of dropped polymer magazines striking the upper tower, or on full-auto/suppressed, cracking the feed lips. This problem appeared exacerbated by the mass of cartridges once the magazine was fully loaded. Lancer Systems attempted to resolve this concern by making three of the four sides to the feed lip assembly molded steel for added strength. It was noted during evaluations that a fully loaded L5AWM magazine did appropriately seat and lock in the magwell with the bolt closed/forward. The sidewalls of the magazine while thinner, did not bulge and they remained parallel under the spring’s tension of a full 30-rounds. Another added function of the L5AWM was the anti-tilt follower filled up the space inside the magazine more than other brands, leaving less room for potential debris.
  • Weight Average (3/5): With its weight of 4.8 ounces (empty), the L5AWM has a mass appropriate (or average) for its hybrid design—bringing together its polymer body and stainless steel feed lip assembly. The next alternative would be full stainless steel magazines, such as by ASC, which have an average weight of up to 6.4 ounces. In comparison to other polymer-based magazines; Magpul Industries Gen2 MOE (4.6 ounces) or Gen3 (5 ounces), as well as Hexmag’s Series 2 (4.6 ounces), or Daniel Defense’s DD Magazine (7 ounces) all demonstrate the variance in weight due to differences in magazine design and material. This placed the L5AWM within the average weight of the competitors noted.

Overall Rating – Good (20/25)

Product Link: https://lancer-systems.com/product/l5awm-30-magazine/

IMG_2889_TackenbergI am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.


SB Tactical SBA3 Brace: A Minimalist Approach With Adjustability

Released in February 2018, the SBA3 is one of the newer AR pistol braces offered by SB Tactical, and among many along its AR, AK, and shotgun models. The A3 variant was intended to bridge the design differences between the original and fixed SBM4, with the adjustability of the future SBA4. The SBA3 features an adjustable length with mil-spec buffer tube compatibility, and a QD mounting point that provides for improved comfort and function for shooters.

While the SBA3 was intended as a follow-on to the SBM4, the SBA3 has a more minimal forearm support wings, and a 1” hook-and-loop strap to secure the brace to the arm. This gives the A3 a less-bulkier profile overall. However, where the A3 differs is the brace now accepts any 7075 mil-spec carbine buffer tube (included with brace) and thus has a 5-position adjustable length. The newer A3 brace also includes a metal ambidextrous QD mounting point for slings behind the buffer adjustment pin.

Fully collapsed, the A3 has a minimal length of 6.5”, while on a fully extended carbine buffer tube measures 9.5”. Understanding these measurements can become impetrative when determining the overall length of an AR build to meet ATF regulations on AR pistols.

With a narrower 1.8” polymer body, the spine of the A3 provides a minimalist profile for the user that avoids excessive snagging while still giving an angled platform for a cheek weld. This is an improvement over the SBM4, and for comparison an improvement over the smaller, thinner, and lighter Magpul CTR buttstock.

The SBA3 is available in FDE (featured) Black, OD Green, or Stealth Grey.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • Cost – Average (3/5): At an MSRP of $169.99 the A3 is the same price as the SBA4, thus giving the user the opportunity to find a design that best suits their needs at the same cost. The A3 is also available at secondary sites for approximately $129, with some retailer coupons or sales during holiday’s providing the brace for even a lower cost. Given that SB Tactical is the market leader for firearm braces, there is no direct competitor for comparison to the A3. However, its predecessor the SBM4 ($99) with a similar design, does include many of the same stabilization aspects, but the SBM4 is only for use with pistol buffer tubes and as such is not adjustable. Even the more recent A4 ($169) is lighter and adjustable, while the SBPDW ($299) is one of the heaviest AR pistol braces on the market. In all this gives the A3 an average price range for its time on the market and amount of materials involved.
  • Comfort – Average (3/5): From a comfort aspect, the minimalist sides of the A3 were not as obtrusive as the M4 or A4, and gave good support to the forearm. This did result in the AR pistol canting slightly while in use, but the support strap kept the overall brace secured even with the weight of the firearm held out at full extension to the body. Users with thicker forearms may find it more difficult to get a deeper lock within the brace at first, until the rubber has had time to adequately break in. The nylon support strap was slightly elastic which made getting a positive/tight bond somewhat difficult, but not unattainable. One notable feature for the A3 was the approximate 2” wide angled polymer body that gave the user more surface for a positive cheek weld. This was an improvement over the SBM4’s width of 2.0” and thus narrower angle/less surface for contact. Internet research showed a number of aftermarket replacement straps to most SB Tactical braces, including Lunar Concepts “Split Fix” for the A3 that prevents overlapping and permanent warping of the rubberized plastic while in storage, and the recommendation to the manufacturer would perhaps examine improving or offering alternate straps for improved comfort and function.
  • Durability – Average (3/5): The SBA3 was made with dominantly a minimalist polymer body that gave it a similar profile to a A2-style stock, but with less rigidity than the A4 brace, and provided a semi-stable platform for a positive cheek weld. There was some play noted between the brace and the buffer tube that could be manipulated with the hand, as well as some elements of the body (such as the locking pin) felt somewhat frail. The forearm support sides were made from a rubberized ABS material that gave the sides sufficient flex to contour around the arm. Over time and use, the SBA3’s support sides did collapse and overlap when stored against the loop. It is most likely that over time, the element of the A3 that will actually wear out first, will be the hook-and-loop material to the 1” support strap (another reason there are aftermarket straps available).
  • Functionality – Good (3/5): Functionally, the SBA3 was easier to don on the forearm as opposed to bulkier braces, it being necessary to fully loosen the support strap and push the arm through the sides. The newer A3 also had more rigidity and coverage in its forearm minimalist support sides. This defiantly effected support to the AR pistol given its minimal contact surface, and linear dimensions that contoured around the arm once the support strap was tightened. Adjusting the position on the carbine buffer was a little loose, most likely attributed to variances in buffer tube dimensions and that not all tubes are a one-size-fits-all. But with minimal effort the A3 was able to move across all five (of six) positions on the carbine buffer tube. The ambidextrous QD mounting points were full metal and accommodated a variety of mounting accessories. The feel of the QD point (behind the adjustment pin and closer to the forearm brace) made connecting QD points somewhat difficult in the tight space. Some adjustment of your sling may be necessary to accommodate this QD location.
  • Weight – Excellent (5/5): At 6.75 ounces (w/o buffer tube) the SBA3 is relatively lightweight, and among the line of other SB Tactical braces had a good scoring. As noted above, once secured to the arm, the brace did help to keep the AR pistol balanced as well as helped alleviate the weight of the firearm forward of the body. In comparison, the heaviest AR pistol brace in the SB line is the SBPDW (18.14 ounces) while others, such as the SBM47 (15.5 ounces), SBM4 (8.7 ounces), and SBA4 (10 ounces) demonstrate the weight of the SBA3 is towards the lighter side given most other AR pistol braces trend to a more minimalist approach with less materials that achieve the same results. The added weight is the payoff for the SBA3 to have that five-position adjustability.

Overall Rating – Above Average (17/25)

Product Link: https://www.sb-tactical.com/product/sba3/

***Editor’s Note: The history and ruling of AR/AK pistol braces is a sordid one. From the initial ATF ruling in 2014the “clarification” letter by Max Kingery (then-acting Chief of Firearms Technology Criminal Branch) in 2015, and a second ATF ruling in 2017, and the most recent ATF clarification in 2019 the regulation agency has struggled to provide a clear ruling on the application of such devices. Specifically shouldering, the topic of proper use of braces has caused more internet arguments among “internet lawyers”. Currently ATF guidance as of 2019 states as follows:

“To the extent the January 2015 Open Letter implied or has been construed to hold; that incidental, sporadic, or situational ‘use’ of an arm-brace (in its original approved configuration) equipped firearm from a firing position at or near the shoulder was sufficient to constitute a ‘redesign,’ such interpretations are incorrect and not consistent with ATF’s interpretation of the statute or the manner in which it has historically been enforced.”

As such, Per the ATF the use of an AR/AK pistol brace comes down to intent. Thus, accidental or “sporadic” shouldering of an AR pistol brace is not illegal. When consistently shouldered however, it demonstrates the intent to subvert regulations on SBRs by utilizing the AR pistol and brace as an impromptu work-around (and thus illegal). The same is said by adding accessories intended for precise accuracy as found with an SBR, such as scopes or utilizing irons. During the course of evaluations, any shouldering of the SBA3 was purely accidental, as efforts are made to test the brace within various range iterations to the extent of design, while still adhering to ATF regulations.

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Magpul Bipod: Get a Solid Base

Released in 2019, the Magpul Bipod is one of many efforts by the company to diversify its product line into additional firearm accessories. Using its proprietary polymer, the Magpul Bipod is designed to give stability and support to rifles regardless of terrain, with fully adjustable cant and height.

Available in a variety of preferred mounting styles (featuring Picatinny Rail Mount), the Magpul Bipod offers lo-profile versatility and durability, in large part to its given design and materials. Made from a combination of anodized mil-spec 6061 T-6 aluminum and stainless steel, and Magpul’s injection-molded polymer, the bipod has a number of adjustable features. When collapsed, the bipod has an overall profile of just 2.3” off the barrel at 3.3” wide.

The support legs of the bipod have integral mechanisms in conjunction with the mount that enable for one-handed deployment and collapse using the push-button control.

When deployed in the shooting position, the legs also have an adjustable height and lock-out button to securely overcome a variety in elevated terrain. The legs themselves can adjust from 6.3” to 10.3” in overall height along any of the seven ½” detent positions along the bipod legs for varying heights. At the end of both legs is a rubberized pad (removable if so desired with a punch) for a sure and secure grip on any smooth surface.

At the bottom is a knurled, tool-less locking knob that allows the bipod 50° of total tilt and 40° of total pan, with the added function of locking the pan to 0° while maintaining full tilt functionality. The bottom of this locking knob also includes a rubberized base pad for a non-marring, non-skid resting point for if the bipod itself is collapsed.

The Magpul Bipod is available in Black (featured) and Flat Dark Earth.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • Cost – Good (4/5): With an MSRP of $109.95 (for the picatinny variant), Magpul offers various bipod configurations that address all common rifle variants on the current market. The bipod is a combination of Magpul’s polymer exterior for function and lightweight design, and anodized aluminum for added rigidity and strength. Other market alternatives often utilize exclusively aluminum, and that is reflected in their price. Bipods like the HBRS ($106.50) from Harris and the V8 Bipod ($219.95) by Atlas illustrate that the all-metal design often incurs a greater cost, but other bipods by Leapers and its UTG Tactical Bipod ($33.95) show cheaper variants are available. This all gives the Magpul Bipod a good value, balancing function and materials with cost to the end-user within the current market.
  • Durability – Good (4/5): From a durability aspect the Magpul Bipod had a good level of rigidity and strength to keep the overall support of the rifle (in this case an AR-10) during function and use. Even fully extended, the bipod legs were fully locked and properly supportive. As the evaluations continued, some surface marring was noted on the polymer exterior, as the bipod came into contact with various hard surfaces (benches, rock, barricades, etc.) but nothing that was detrimental to overall function. Perhaps the area that encountered the most marring was the bipod’s rubberized feet and over the course of time these would likely need to be replaced in the long-term.
  • Functionality – Good (4/5): Functionally, the Magpul Bipod had good level of overall function, providing not just adjustable height of support for the rifle, but also provided an ability to tilt and pan as needed to acquire a proper sight picture. The picatinny mount itself was secure throughout the evaluations and ensured the bipod itself remained secure. The locking mechanism for the bipod legs did only allot for a fully up or down positioning, with no positioning in between (perhaps something Magpul may want to look into including in future variants of its bipod). Even with shooting .308 ammunition, the bipod handled the recoil impulse well and never faltered nor gave signs that the locking mechanism wasn’t capable of handling it.
  • Weight – Good (4/5): Weighing in at a mere 11 ounces, the Magpul Bipod was very lightweight for its overall size and function, with many other all-metal alternatives weighing more. The weight characteristics are due to the balance of material, blending the lightweight polymer to augment the supportive aluminum inner structure. The overall weight of the bipod was minimally unbalancing—adding only a minimal amount of weight to the far end of the rifle that was noted while carrying the rifle. But while deployed, the weight of the bipod was not distracting nor effected support to the rifle. In comparison, the HBRS (13 ounces) from Harris and the V8 Bipod (12.7 ounces) illustrate that bipods with all-metal construction do so at the increase of weight.

Overall Rating – Good (20/25)

Product Link: https://magpul.com/catalog/product/view/id/7976/s/magpul-bipod-for-1913-picatinny-rail/category/95/?mp_global_color=undefined

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Streamlight Wedge: The Pocket Torch That Doesn’t Burn

Made for the everyday carry, the Wedge by Streamlight offers users the ability to have a variable-powered handheld flashlight that is light enough to be easily carried in the pocket, bag, or to their gear.

Made from an overall body of anodized aluminum, the Wedge was released in 2021 as a means to expand the Streamlight product line for daily use products. Measuring in at 5.46” (L) x 3.30” (W), the Wedge includes a slim, ergonomic design whereby all seams and the USB charging port are IPX7 sealed to make the flashlight waterproof for 30 minutes up to a depth to 1 meter.

The Wedge’s design includes a rotating, interchangeable control switch and reversible belt clip to ensure that when needed, the switch is indexed properly. In addition a tapered body, grooved sidewall, and attached wrist lanyard help ensure positive retention and comfort.

The internal, USB-C rechargeable battery in the Wedge provides the lighting element a continual ON runtime of up to three hours with 300 lumens to a distance of 69 meters. The new Temporarily Heightened Regulated Output (THRO) feature built into the switch will momentarily increase that output to 1,000 lumens for 110 meters and last up to 35 seconds before returning back to the main output setting (this prevents power drain). It should be noted that the control switch has an internal power indicator for easy visual recognition on available battery charge.

The Wedge is available in Black (featured) and Coyote.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • Cost – Average (3/5): Depending on retailer, the Streamlight Wedge can be found at a number of distributors between $80 (from Flashlight Depot), and $99 (at Cabela’s) depending on availability and model. The wedge brings together ergonomic design in an EDC-friendly aluminum chassis that will always be ready when needed. Consumers should take note to order only from trusted or direct distributors as counterfeits are always a risk when purchasing online. In contrast, the Surefire Stiletto ($99), the Fenix E35 ($69.95) from Fenix Lighting, and the Olight i5T EOS ($29.95) all show the variance in price among EDC pen lights, and while lumen output and design play a great deal in price, the Wedge offers an appropriate (or average) balance of function and cost.
  • Comfort – Good (4/5): From a comfort aspect, the Wedge fit into the hand similarly as a wide-tipped sharpie or thick highlighter, with a similar feel in heft. The aircraft-grade materials of the Wedge didn’t make it feel excessively weighty, nor unbalanced. Meanwhile, keeping it clipped inside the pocket for daily wear felt secure and at no point inadvertently poked or fell out. The rotating switch moved easily with little tension under the spring when pressing to the THRO setting, and when released returned to its normal setting. The lumens generated were comfortable for the eye and did not flood a room or confined space.
  • Durability – Good (4/5): With a housing made entirely from aircraft-grade aluminum, the Wedge had a durability level comparable to many market comparators. This ensured regardless of what gets knocked around against the light, or situation it is employed, the Wedge continued to hold a high-degree of impact resistance. Another feature tested was the glass (presumably Borofloat similar to that found in other Streamlight products) by striking it against a tabletop and magazines ten times. This neither impacted the ability of the Wedge to function nor damaged the front-end glass or the LED element. Some superficial marring was noted at the point of impact, but was merely cosmetic and did not penetrate to the lower base metal.
  • Functionality – Good (4/5): Functionally there wasn’t much to the Wedge aside from its normal 300 lumen function, and the 1000 lumen THRO setting. The ability to quickly apply the THRO setting was a nice additive, although it would have been better if there had also been a selectable strobe feature for defensive purposes. The included visual battery status built inside the switch did provide immediate recognition on what power status was available and when it needed to be recharged. Moreover, the ability to switch the belt clip around and reverse the switch position did mean that the Wedge was a comfortable fit for left or right-handed individuals.
  • Weight – Good (3/5): Weighing in at a demure 3.3 ounces, the Wedge brought together the ability to serve as a handheld light, with a variable throw of up to 1,000 lumens, in just a very small and robust package. The reversible belt clip allowed for the Wedge to be easily attached inside the pocket or bag while its overall weight was neither distracting, off-balance, nor pulling on the pocket or belt. In contrast, the Surefire Stiletto (2.8 ounces), the Fenix E35 (2.36 ounces) from Fenix Lighting, and the Olight i5T EOS (2.12 ounces) all show that the Wedge is only slightly heavier that other market competitors (though that difference is probably less than people could perceive) and appropriate (or average) for the device and market.

Overall Rating – Above Average (18/25)

Product Link: https://www.streamlight.com/products/detail/index/wedge

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via High Ground Media, LLC., so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Lancer System Adaptive Magwell: Speed at Any Angle

Introduced in 2015, the Adaptive Magwell (AM) by Lancer Systems is a bolt-on upgrade that expands the magwell opening of the standard AR-15 for easier drive of a magazine into the receiver and quicker reloads.


Made from either a single piece, or two (depending on which model of AM is selected) of machined 6061 T6 aluminum, the AM has a solid construction that ensures a high degree of abrasion and impact resistance. For the purpose of this review, the single piece AM was selected.


From the sides, the AM expands the overall width of the magwell to 1.63” across with angled interior sides to help further drive the inserting magazine inward. From the top to bottom, the AM expanded the length of the AM to 3.02”.


The Lancer AM’s angled funnel directs magazines into the magwell regardless of approach angle or cant. This can decrease reload time and improving reliability under stressful or adverse conditions.


It should be noted the AM is not compatible with Magpul’s Gen3 PMAG’s due to the Gen 3’s robust over-travel stop.


  • Designed for milspec AR-15 rifles and standard forged lower receivers with removable trigger guards
  • Includes rubber gaskets for a snug rattle-free fit
  • Compatible with most standard M4/M16/AR15 pattern magazines

The Adaptive Magwell is only available in a matte Black (featured).


Product Evaluation Scores:

  • CostAverage (3/5): At an MSRP of $115, the Adaptive Magwell (AM) (either single piece or two-piece) is made from a solid block of T6 aluminum for maximum strength and durability. The AM is perhaps one of the larger non-polymer magwells on the market and will resist all but the most serious abrasion, impact, or chemicals. In comparison, the Armaspec Rhino ($20.90), MAS Defense Flared Magwell Adaptor ($44.99), Sylvan Arms Adaptor ($54.99), or Cobalt Kinetics Magwell Extension ($75) show just how diverse the market is in design. It should be noted while the AM is one of the most expensive AR-15 magwells available, it is also one of the largest, durable, and functional. As such, the cost balances against those factors to give the AM an average scoring.
  • Comfort Excellent<