High Ground Media, LLC

Blending innovative technology and design with traditional tactical function, the QD-NVL (V2) by LeonWorx Solutions is a retention system for night vision devices that provides a solid lock and safety to otherwise very valuable sensitive items.

Using the sewable V-Buckle 25 by Fidlock, the V2 is the second version LeonWorx’s unique QD-NVL retention lanyard for securing night vision to helmets that uses a magnetized lift opening mechanism. This mechanism itself has a static breaking load of 588 newtons (a measurement of force), or 60kg (or 132lb) and can only be actioned if the proper lift angle is utilized.

At the base, the QD-NVL (V2) utilizes a double-layer panel of 2” (W) x 3” (L) 17337 Mil Spec solution-dyed Cordura nylon webbing, with hook-and-loop (male) on the bottom for attaching to corresponding hook-and-loop panels on helmets or covers.

On three sides of the QD-NVL (V2) are nylon pass-through loops for threading shock or paracord through for added security. Additionally, an elastic nylon cuff is behind the V-Buckle for spare battery storage.  

The fourth (front) side of the QD-NVL (V2) is reserved for a 1” tab that allots for shock cordage to attach to the night vision device, and can be adjusted via press-button slide lock.

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Good (4/5): With a list price of $44.99, the QD-NVL offers a unique locking mechanism to secure an end-user’s night vision device to their helmet’s preferred hook-and-loop panel or covers. Considering the dollar value of many night vision devices, any added security serves as a beneficial insurance against slippage or damage to the retention arm that could potential cause the night vision to fall off. The Fidlock buckle itself is a $25 value, and from a European company that specializes in biking and sport retention locks. The bottom of the QD-NVL also utilizes industrial hook-and-loop (male) to ensure positive connection. The closest market comparator to the QD-NVL would be the Nightvision Elastic Retention Device ($35) by Kinetic Consulting, or the SBL NVG Lanyard ($35) by T.REX Arms, but both are only a simple hook-and-loop panel and lack the mechanical locking mechanism of the QD-NVL. Wilcox does offer an NVG mechanical Lanyard ($68.14) but those are simple spring-tension lanyards that mount directly into specific helmet NVG shrouds. Thus, the QD-NVL (V2) is at a good price point amid the market, offering significant security over other retention lanyards with a balanced price for the hardware included.  
• Comfort – Good (4/5): From a comfort aspect, the QD-NVL (V2) was simplistic in approach, came pre-assembled, and attached easily. The industrial hook-and-loop did provide a noticeably stronger than typical connection to the corresponding panels on both the helmet and helmet cover. The locking mechanism of the V-Buckle 25 itself broke easily when the pull tab was pulled directly outward/up, but remained locked firmly when pulled forward (such as if the NVGs broke free of the mount and suddenly placed increased tension/load on the front of the device). The strength of the V-Buckle 25 was such that it could fully support the weight of a loaded helmet (i.e. with earpro, NVGs, light/accessories) freely and without any slippage. The magnetic element inside the base of the V-Buckle 25 allowed for easy realignment and rehoming of the release mechanism, without any measurable effort, to re-engage the lock.
• Durability – Average (3/5): With its base 17337 Mil Spec material made from double-layer solution-dyed nylon webbing, the QD-NVL (V2) had a somewhat pliable base that contoured to the curvature of the helmet easily. The fabric itself had typical (or average) abrasion resistance amid the nylon gear market, and held up with expected usage. Despite continual re-adjustment, the hook-and-loop (male) material, nor threading, showed any signs of premature wear or excessive fraying. Over time, the shock cord will need to be replaced simply due to exposure and wear (typical for this type of material). Otherwise, the V-Buckle 25 had a max load capacity of over 100 pounds and kept producing the same level of secure lock over the term of usage, and showed no signs of wear at the edges of the aluminum or weakening of the magnet.
• Functionality – Good (4/5): Functionally, the QD-NVL (V2) came down to a good level of added strength and retention as a safety backup to the NVG mount. The V-Buckle 25 locking mechanism was able to support the full weight of the overall helmet, while freestanding only off the locking mechanism’s pull tab—yet it still did not slip unless the tab was pulled as intended. Elsewhere, the elastic cuff for battery storage was initially very tight, but that was ideal considering it was the only measure securing the spare battery. It could easily fit other items like full-sized chemlight. The side nylon loops were intended for tying additional retention/paracord to the QD-NVL (V2) for added security, but without other accessories like a battery pack/Mohawk/earpro helmet mounts for hardpoint connections, they offered only slot space for mini chemlights. The only notable aspect from a negative functional perspective was that when the night vision was deployed downward, and the greatest level of tension was exerted on the shock cord and QD-NVL (V2), the rear edges of the nylon fabric would curl or pull on the helmet cover fabric. It was never enough to cause the hook-and-loop to begin separating, but noticeable because it displayed how that tension was being carried through the QD-NVL (V2). Those with the longer band of hook-and-loop on their helmets/covers will most likely experience less of this effect, unless positioning the QD-NVL (V2) further to the rear of the helmet, and thus placing more tension on the cordage and body of the locking mechanism. A recommendation to LeonWorx would be to consider adding a grommet at the rearward portion of the QD-NVL (V2) so that it could serve as an alternative tie-down point if the nylon loops were otherwise not available.
• Weight – Average (3/5): Weighing in at 1.8 ounces, a majority of the (minuscule) weight to the QD-NVL (V2) was from the overall double layer of 17337 nylon and shock cord. The retention lanyard as a whole was not noticeable when mounted on the helmet, did not shift, nor was unbalancing. However, the inclusion of a mechanical locking mechanism (rated to over 100 pounds) added slightly to the overall product weight as opposed to only a hook-and-loop panel. In contrast, the Nightvision Elastic Retention Device (0.50 ounces) by Kinetic Consulting, or the SBL NVG Lanyard (1.0 ounces) by T.REX Arms illustrate that use of only hook-and-loop retention panels are slightly lighter, but they also only have a rating to approximately 50 pounds. The Wilcox retention lanyards are similarly only 0.50 ounces and have a breakaway rating of 12 pounds, but necessitate direct mounting to an NVG shroud. Thus for the minimal addition in weight, the QD-NVL (V2) still offered superior retention levels and was an appropriate (or average) balance between all market alternatives and designs.

Overall Rating – Above Average (18/25)

Product Link: https://www.leonworx.com/products1/p/qd-nvl-v2-coyote-brown-khaki

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via High Ground Media, LLC, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Similar to the Spot Shot Wi-Fi Camera, the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera by Shooting Made Easy offers the same unique device for hunters and long-distance shooters—but includes the added feature of an integrated hi-resolution screen. This further alleviates eye fatigue and muscle tension, meaning you can spend more time doing what you want—putting those rounds downrange.

With an enclosed Wi-Fi camera, the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera comprises of an adjustable chuck-mounting system (adjustable between 1.0” to 2.5” in diameter) that attaches to most common spotting scope eye pieces.

When paired with the free Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera app on Google Play or Apple Store, the Wi-Fi camera is capable of streaming high definition video to most common smart devices, up to 150’ from the camera. In addition, the video is displayed on an adjustable 2.4” high-definition monitor that can tilt approximately 15-degrees and has an adjustable brightness. A rubberized sun shield helps mitigate excessive reflection and light value.

The camera app itself allows the user to observe, record, and take still images while storing them on either an SD card (not included) or smart device. 

The Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera is powered by a rechargeable lithium polymer battery that gives the camera a runtime of approximately eight to ten continuous hours. A micro USB port enables for charging, while the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera itself has a single power button with low-power indicator.

The Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera is only available in in a blended Crème/Black color combination, and comes with a custom soft carrying bag and Micro USB power cable.

Editor’s Note: For the purpose of this review, a Vortex RAZOR HD 48×65 spotting scope was paired with the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera, however it did not influence nor was part of the review process for the camera system itself.

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Excellent (5/5): With an MSRP of $199.99, the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera has an enclosed micro HD camera and Wi-Fi transmitter that is capable of projecting the spotting scope field of view 150’ to your app-enabled smart device. In addition, an adjustable screen on the exterior augmented the camera system when the smart device was unavailable. The adjustable chucks ensure the widest adaptability to most common spotting scope eye pieces on the current market. In contrast, other similar spotting scope cameras include the Hawk ($329) by TargetVision, the Spotter LR ($299) by Tactacam, and the Hawk ($329) by Longshot. Thus, in comparison the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera is excellently priced for the consumer given similar designs.
• Comfort – Good (4/5): From a comfort aspect, the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera was easy to install to the eyepiece of the spotting scope even at a max diameter, and the chuck-adjustment ring moved easily to provide a snug fit. Navigation within the app was likewise easy with the few options using common icons for easy recognition, and to make sure it was not complex nor overwhelming.
• Durability – Average (3/5): The Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera was enclosed within an ABS/polymer shell that gave it some modest level of protection from the occasional bump during transport, or hard contact with other items. Likewise, the 2.4” screen had a rubberized sun shield, although it frequently either fell off or was easily removed while making adjustments. One recommendation to SME would be to find a way to anchor the sun shield or integrate it into the overall housing. The exterior ABS shell felt much like most commercial-grade electronic housings, and it is unlikely this camera system would survive a fall on concrete (an experiment not tried given lack of any rubberization). Again, the recommendation to SME would be to consider rubberizing the outer edges to provide some level of drop protection. SME does offer a 2-year “Bulletproof” warrantee (sold separately) that users would need to consider based on their expected level of usage and protection for the camera.
• Functionality – Average (3/5): Functionally, the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera was somewhat simplistic in use, with merely mounting to the eyepiece and opening the app being the extent of complexity. But some difficulty was experienced with syncing to the smart device, something easily resolved by resetting the Wi-Fi settings to the camera (instructions found in the manual). Once reset the issue never arose again. All focal adjustments had to be made from the scope and eyepiece, as the camera was strictly a passive system when ON. This left a lot of bouncing around in the field of view until all adjustments were completed. It would be strongly recommended for users to ensure that a strong tripod be used (not provided) to further stabilize the overall scope and camera. When used with the app, much like the Spot Shot, the camera resolution showed clear and crisp video and images at the 50 yard line, but at 300 yards the color and resolution started to show some pixilation and color bleed. This suggests the same optical camera system is in both units. In addition; as the scope zoom was used for further distances and the focal plane of the eye piece narrowed, rounded shadows started to appear in the corners of the field of view reflecting the dimensions of the round eye piece projected on to a square screen. This was not inhibiting in any way, but something users should be aware of. Otherwise, the image and video capture functions worked as expected, and the library function easily brought up all files taken with the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera. It should be noted that unlike the “Sight In” target camera system by SME, there is no function in the app for the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera to do target development or shot tracking.
• Weight – Good (4/5): Weighing in at 12.7 ounces, the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera is lightweight enough not to be heavy in a range bag or backpack, but given that the weight is then added to the extreme end of a spotting scope made it difficult for smaller tripods to manage. The solution was to move the spotting scope to the larger tripod with a much wider base and sturdier material, and a larger locking mechanism. This gave the overall spotting scope improved stability with the camera added in moderate wind and amid other shooters. Shooters will need to consider their tripod accessories before venturing out with this camera. In contrast, the Hawk (16 ounces) by TargetVision, the Spotter LR (9 ounces) by Tactacam, and the Hawk (16 ounces) by Longshot all illustrate that the Wi-Fi Optical Scope Camera is at the lower end of the weight spectrum and thus earns itself a good score for its relative lightweight to functional use.

Overall Rating – Above Average (19/25)

Product Link: https://www.shootingmadeeasy.com/wifi-spotting-scope-camera-w-screen/

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Recently released, the 7304RDS (RDS for Red Dot Sight) and the 7385 7TS Drop-Rig holsters are among the latest of Automatic Locking System (ALS) series by Safariland. While each includes some of the same fundamental aspects that lend themselves to the Safariland legacy, each holster is slightly tailored to a different end user. Knowing these can help the end-user decide which is best. 

Shared Values

Both the 7304RDS and 7385 holsters are made from Safariland’s proprietary blend of injection-molded, nylon polymer called SafariSeven™. The SafariSeven™ material is a DuPont product that makes the holster and mounting system very durable and highly resistant to moisture, oil, or resins. In addition, SafariSeven™ can withstand extreme temperatures between 300F degrees to -50F. It also features an open-top design with multiple interior risers that give ample distance, or an “air barrier” between the holster and all firearm surfaces.

The top of both the 7304 and 7385 include a removable hood guard to help prevent firearm takeaways or close contact with the ALS Lever when drawing/holstering a firearm.

Both holsters feature Safariland’s ALS design. This element ensures a solid locking mechanism when the firearm is holstered. De-activated by a thumb-pressure lever, the ALS locking mechanism is released, and the firearm can be easily drawn straight up. As noted, small risers inside the both holster also help maintain that “air barrier” so that any water or debris inside the holster can easily fall through and not obstruct function.

Like many other Safariland holsters, both the 7304 and 7385 come with a thigh mounting platform, with a single or double leg strap (based on end-user selection), and quick-release buckle off the belt is also an option. The thigh platform also includes front and rear mounting holes for magazine holders or other accessories.

Likewise both holsters are configurable at the time of purchase for a variety of popular weapon lights, such as the Streamlight TLR-1 HL (featured). The Safariland light-bearing holsters include a muzzleplug, thus if purchasing a holster for a pistol that has a compensator the end-user must select the next “size” up. For example, if using a compensated G17, end-users will need to select a holster for a G34.

Where They Differ

Perhaps the biggest area where the 7304RDS and 7385 7TS holsters differ is in the incorporation of a protective hood for Red Dot Sight in the 7304 (enclosed just within the Self Locking System (SLS) rotating hood), or without an RDS hood in the 7385.

While they both feature the ALS, the 7304RDS features a red dot shroud/paddle design shielding the RDS when holstered, as well as a rotating Level II SLS protection hood. In contrast, the 7385 has neither the RDS shroud nor SLS hood.

The 7304RDS is only currently available for Glock, Sig, HK and other patterned handguns and is available in Black (featured) and Coyote. TLR-7 as well as TLR-1/X300U variants available.

• Product Link: https://safariland.com/products/model-7304rds-7ts-als-sls-tactical-holster-model_7304rds

The 7385 is only currently available for Glock, Sig, S&W, HK, and other patterned handguns and is available in Black (featured) and Coyote. TLR-7 as well as TLR-1/X300U variants available.

• Product Link: https://safariland.com/products/model-7385-7ts-als-omv-tactical-holster-w-quick-release-34842

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Fair (2/5): Both the 7304RDS and the 7385 7TS have a variety of options (draw hand, finish, color, etc.) that are available, as well as recommended add-ons that effect the overall cost, but the 7304 starts at $283.00 while the 7385 starts at $215.00. This price reflects the size, materials and (most importantly) Safariland’s specific RDS design/fit in contrast to those of similar configuration. Both the 7304RDS and the 7385 7TS are full-coverage holsters (meaning they fully enclose the firearm). This included an optic shroud (on the 7304RDS) or rear sight coverage (on the 7385 7TS), that protect the firearm while keeping it within easy and immediate access. Other market alternatives similar in holster design include the Thigh Holster ($110) from Ares Tactical, the SERPA Level 3 Thigh Holster ($149) from Blackhawk!, and the Leg-Drop Holster ($169) from Stealthgear USA. However, in all these alternatives, they lack the comprehensive design, safety features, and materials as what Safariland has. And while the 7304RDS or the 7385 7TS are indeed some of the most expensive holsters on the market—that price is fair for the safety features and materials included in the purchase.
• Comfort – Good (4/5): Overall the fit of the thigh platform on both the 7304 and 7385 against the leg were more comfortable than other manufacturers experienced. The quarter-crescent shape of the platform contoured to the mid-thigh due to the material’s semi-flexible properties, whereas other vendors have used a more rigid and half-circle platform that didn’t contour as well. Otherwise from a comfort aspect, disengaging the ALS locking mechanism on both holsters was simple, and the draw itself felt smooth. The interior rails that contact the slide to provide retention did not bind nor lock up the gun or WML, nor resist/jam when re-holstering. The SLS design and RDS dust cover of the 7304 likewise did not inhibit the draw of the weapon during movement, whereas the 7385 was a more simplistic design without the augmenting SLS. Overall both holsters felt smooth in function and there was no observable hard-angle, overmolding, or unfinished edges.
• Durability – Good (4/5): As with most of its holsters, the 7304RDS and 7385 7TS were both made from the same proprietary DuPont polymer blend called SafariSeven™. Safariland maintains this makes the holster more durable to wear, and oil resistant. That said, continual drawing/holstering and strong arm racking off the holster did eventually leave some surface marring along the interior of the holster (most likely from the front sight post or optic or incidental contact with external surfaces) but left no marring on the firearm’s slide or RDS. Extensive attempts were made at drawing/removing/shaking the firearm free of the holster while keeping the ALS engaged, even to the point of two individuals attempting to pull the holster and pistol apart, however none of them were successful and the holster/hardware was not compromised or damaged. As before, the only noted negative was that as abrasion increased (from drills, or contact to ground or other surfaces), some corresponding marring along the exterior was noted. Surface blemishes to the exterior of the SafariSeven™ holsters could be resolved by using a lot-grit pad to buff out the marring. An easier solution to avoid the marring issue would be for end-users to consider an aftermarket Cordura wrap.
• Functionality – Good (4/5): Functionally the biggest difference between the 7304RDS and the 7385 7TS was the “paddle” style RDS dust cover in the 7304. The RDS cover was very reminiscent of the “break away” feature in some hardware that, when unlocked, there was absolutely no restriction in movement of the firearm as the paddle fell freely away. This aspect alone necessitated a slight design shift inside the 7304 holster to allot for the RDS cover and SLS retention. With its design, the 7304 felt more appropriate for duty and field work, with its protective enclosure around the RDS and added retention. When released, the SLS provided quick mechanical movement to clear the weapon retention strap and allowed for free movement of the hood during the draw. The 7385 lacked these added retention values, but the ALS (which is a staple in many Safariland holsters, and in the 7304) still positively retained the weapon inside the holster despite varied stressor drills or movement. One suggestion to Safariland would perhaps think about making the actual ALS button larger in both models so it would be more tactile and easily found (especially when not looking). As a current solution, Oregon Trail Defense does offer its aftermarket Nub Mod for RDS, ALS, and SLS switches, which increases the surface are and angle to a more ergonomic profile.
• Weight – Average (3/5): The weight difference of both holsters was miniscule with the 7304RDS coming in at 1.5 pounds (with thigh platform and leg straps) and the 7385 7TS at 1.4 pounds (with thigh platform and leg straps). This weight was mostly attributed to the mass of material needed for both the polymer thigh platform, as well as the holster itself. In both cases the overall holster was still light enough so as not to be burdensome or off-balancing on the outer thigh, nor fatigue the hip. In comparison, the Thigh Holster (1 pound) from Ares Tactical, the SERPA Level 3 Thigh Holster (1 pound) from Blackhawk!, and the Leg-Drop Holster (15.2 ounces) from Stealthgear USA all show that while slightly heavier, both the 7304RDS and 7385 7TS  are right around the appropriate (or average) weight for holster of this style and material.

Overall Rating – Above Average (17/25)

Product Link: https://safariland.com

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via High Ground Media LLC, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.