High Ground Media, LLC

Blending its features for law enforcement and life on the range, the Duty Glove by Viktos brings together improved features that will provide the wearer with greater tactile control, durability, and improved comfort.

Made with a dual chassis that brings together a mesh fabric backhand, combined with an AX suede Laredo leather palm, the Duty glove affords a high-degree of breathability with adequate enclosure around the hand and fingers. This synthetic leather extends up and around the front half of each finger and thumb for increased protection.

Between the thumb and forefinger is a reinforced valley that will protect the hand web and material from compromise, be it through abrasion or impact. This is especially good for handgun users of compact and sub-compact handguns due to risk of contact with the slide.

Each finger includes touch-screen compatible segments for use on iPhones or other devices.

The Duty glove features a hook-and-loop enclosure around the wrist bone that secures the glove, as well as anchors a paracord pull loop that aids in donning the glove.

The Duty glove is available in Fieldcraft (featured), Nightfall, Greyman, and Ranger with sizing between Small to 3XL.

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Excellent (5/5): At just $35, the Duty Gloves by Viktos are a very affordable option for gloves that will likely give the consumer longer use than other range/duty gloves. The leather and padded chassis will help ensure abrasion resistance to most of the expected contact points to be encountered while still being comfortable. In comparison, some of the market alternatives for this type of glove would include SKD’s PIG Full Dexterity Glove, ($42.95), Direct Action’s Leather Hard Glove ($37.90), or First Spear’s Multi Climate Glove ($35.99). And while the market has a very narrow price range for this type of accessory, the Duty Gloves were still one of the more affordable for its material giving it a good rating for its overall cost.
• Comfort – Good (4/5): The padding on the chassis gave the Duty Glove a very comfortable feel, being soft enough to contour across the hand while still affording full coverage. Likewise, the leather palm was not stiff nor rigid and easy contoured to the various surfaces encountered. The thumb and forefinger felt a little bulky due to the difference in design between those and the rest of the fingers that utilize breathable side fabric, but this can be attributed to the fact these will be the fingers that also take on the most abrasion. Flexibility around the wrist was comfortable due to the elastic panel on the top of the glove that worked in conjunction with the hook-and-loop tab on the bottom. This way a secure and comfortable fit was achieved.
• Durability – Average (3/5): While the Duty Glove felt it was intended for light-to-moderate use, the leather palms gave it adequate (or average) durability that protected the hand from most hard surfaces (save for puncture or slashing surfaces that often necessitate a Kevlar lining). The same leather material also extended from the palm, down the bottom length of the fingers, and around the front half of the fingers. This ensured the fingertips were properly protected from hard or abrasive surfaces. The stitching appeared to be one continual line throughout most of the glove, with only bartack added to minimal stress points. And while the hook-and-loop (male) panel does also double as a point of anchoring the nylon loop, again there was minimal reinforcement stitching. If Viktos were open to the idea, bartack could be added more to the valley webbing lines and wrist material that would greatly strengthen the Duty Glove in points typically where failures are experienced.
• Functionality – Fair (2/5): From a functional aspect, the Duty Gloves did what was expected, it protected the backhand with its non-slip style of padding material, while giving the palm and fingers extended protection with the leather. Placing the hook-and-loop enclosure on the bottom of the wrist gave the strap an added bonus of not snagging on surfaces encountered, accessories, or other items. With little noted re-enforcement stitching, the nylon loop was better suited as a means to fit the Duty Glove once already on the hand, or a means by which to hang the glove. Using it as the sole means to don the Duty Glove will most likely result in the eventual stitching’s failure, as some people tend to put on range/duty gloves like they are donning nitrile gloves for surgery. One negative function noted was the inability to utilize the integrated touch-screen aspect of the Duty Gloves. Using an iPhone during evaluations, no finger nor part of the material for using a touch screen, worked with the phone’s interface (either to unlock the phone or at the home screen to select an app).
• Weight – Average (3/5): Weighing 2.7 ounces for the pair, the Duty Glove was a lightweight additive to the evaluating range belt or bag. Its materials and size did not contribute to overall bulk, and was otherwise very comfortable. While the PIG Full Dexterity Glove, (2.04 ounces), and Direct Action’s Leather Hard Glove (2.4 ounces) demonstrate the more average market weight for such accessories, other gloves like Mechanix Tactical Impact (5.9 ounces) with its rubberized knuckle and finger protection obviously tip in at a heavier weight. Given the listed market alternatives, they all demonstrate that the Duty Glove is of an adequate (or average) weight among its competitors.

Overall Rating – Above Average (17/25)

Product Link: https://www.viktos.com/collections/gloves/products/leo-duty-gloves

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Revealed at the 2015 SHOT Show, the D-60 Drum Magazine by Magpul Industries led the industry in high-capacity magazine design. The D-60 is a 60-round capacity magazine that combines the ammo capacity to two standard magazines without necessitating a reload.

At the top the upper feed tower of the D-60 is the same as a Gen M3 Pmag and has the same level of compatibility with Colt-patterned rifles and stripper clips. The feed lips and magazine catch of the D-60 enable it to be securely seated even with a closed bolt. A loading ratcheting system allows for each round to be consistently loaded down into the circular drum, while still allowing for a hold-open bolt after the final round has been fired.

The lower drum itself is constructed from the same crush and impact-resistant polymer as other Magpul products.

On the rear of the drum is a paint pen dot matrix to allow for easy visual recognition of markings based on the user’s needs. The rear of the drum also includes a translucent anti-reflective window for current ammunition capacity recognition.

The internals of the D-60 feature corrosion resistant materials, and are specifically designed to be left loaded for long time durations without negative impacts to function. The D-60 itself is designed to be easily disassembled/reassembled using only a flathead screwdriver. Magpul recommends a light cleaning and lubrication after each 1,000 rounds.

Specifications:

• Accommodates 5.56×45 NATO/.223 Remington ammunition only
• Includes a slip-on, semi-rigid dust cover for storage/transport

The D-60 Magazine Drum is only available in Matte Black (featured).

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Good (4/5): The D-60 is somewhat unique amid the magazines offered in the accessories market. In essence it blends the storage capacity of two standard 30-round magazines, into a single drum. But with a price tag of $129.95, it hardly compares in price to the cost of two P-Mags that run approximately $18 each. And given the overall materials for the D-60 are the same polymer as other Magpul products, the added cost can be attributed to the thicker drum body and added hardware that enables for the D-60’s circular storage system. If comparing the D-60 to the original high-capacity drum of KCI’s 100-Round Drum Gen 2 (now $129.99, down from $199.99), X-Product’s 50-Round X-15 ($149.44) or RWB’s 100-Round Drum ($130), it becomes obvious the D-60 is among the cheapester options, and somewhat in the middle of overall ammo carrying capacity.
• Comfort – Good (4/5): Those using the D-60 will immediately have some tactile familiarity with the drum, as the upper magazine tower had the same pattern as other Magpul magazines. In addition, the D-60 also retained the same overall length as other P-Mags so there was no need to accommodate extended clearance around the rifle. The weight (empty and fully loaded) did negatively play into the comfort aspect of the overall rifle, but more on that a little later. Just know that there was a notable heft to the magazine once fully loaded, and when doing more dynamic movements (such as around barricades) it did pull the balance of the rifle around a bit. Obviously this imbalance lessened as was expended. The ratchet system to load each round felt a little flimsy, specifically the throw lever—but at no time during evaluations (before and after drop testing) did it show signs of any problems. The window and ammo count markings could be improved, as the window is rather small and the increments only note 10 and 60 round intervals with nothing in between.
• Durability – Average (3/5): Much like many other magazines, the D-60 was subjected to three drop tests from an approximate height of six feet above a hardened concrete surface. Efforts were made to get a direct strike on the upper tower, but in each drop the weight of the loaded drum pulled over and became the low point for each impact. This resulted in two strikes to the side and one in-between the tower and side. While the strikes resulted in merely aesthetic surface marring, no hit compromised the polymer’s integrity (i.e. cracks or fracturing). Internet research revealed that fully loaded drums can become damaged in normal temperature ranges however, due to the mass of the 60 rounds impacting on weakened parts of the drum (seams, edges, or enclosure clips) against concrete or steel plates. This is likely due to the polymer used in the D-60, appeared to also be the same material for Magpul’s standard P-Mags. Thus, smaller parts or edges are not as capable as maintaining their resilience against the weight of a full 60 rounds vice 30. In those demonstrations where the D-60 was indeed compromised, the drum was able to still successfully feed the ammunition through the rifle afterwards. Magpul magazines have passed the NATO Rough Handling Tests to include droppages from 5 feet from all manner of orientations. It should be noted, much like many other polymer-based products, users should avoid prolonged direct UV exposure in that it may affect the molecular resiliency of the product (i.e. becomes brittle). This may have been the case in some examples where the D-60 was compromised in drop tests as several appeared to be rather aged and faded.
• Functionality – Average (3/5): From a functional aspect, the ratchet system worked well, with solid contact with each round as it was loaded. Perhaps the biggest drawback was that each round had to be individually loaded via the throw lever. This made loading 60 rounds somewhat time consuming. Use of stripper clips did help some, but again each round had to be individually ratcheted. Unloading was much the same, with each round individually ejected out of the magazine tower. The alternative was to hold down the feed tray but in doing so locked out the ratcheted hardware and required the entire D-60 to be disassembled to reset it. Otherwise functionally the D-60 fed consistently and reliably, even after drop testing. Disassembly of the four retention tabs that held on the rear lid was easily done with a screwdriver, but felt a little frail and could perhaps use bolstering or a different means of retention. The tabs themselves were designed to be frangible as an attempt to mitigate any impact to the larger drum.
• Weight – Good (4/5): The D-60 weighed in at approximately 20 ounces (empty), and depending on the ammunition, can weigh up to over 40 ounces (2.5 pounds) fully loaded. As noted in the comfort aspect, this wasn’t necessarily a major detractor but was noticeable when shooting angled positions, such as around hard barricades, with the magazine out to the side. Otherwise the D-60 was balanced in the center of the rifle and when shot from a normal position (with the magazine directly down) wasn’t a negative. Perhaps the biggest factor of the D-60’s weight when fully loaded was as noted in its durability, if dropped and impacted on a seam or frangible feature, the D-60 can potentially crack because of the ammunition’s load impact weight on the polymer. Taken in comparison, the KCI’s 100-Round Drum Gen 2 (2.2 pounds), X-Product’s 50-Round X-15 (3 pounds) or RWB’s 100-Round Drum (3 pounds) all place the D-60 magazine as one of the lighter high-capacity magazines available on the market, and very well (or seen as a good) weighted.

Overall Rating – Above Average (18/25)

Product Link: https://magpul.com/firearm-accessories/pmags/ar15-m4-m16/pmagd60ar-m4-5-56x45drum.html?mp_global_color=118

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Built for mission-critical transport, the Pelican 1750 Protector Case safeguards firearms and gear with a high-impact shell, precision O-ring seal, and dense foam interior for unmatched shock and weather resistance. Trusted by military and law enforcement, it sets the standard for rugged, field-ready protection.

The Protector 1750 Long Case is built from a rugged polypropylene resin for exceptional durability, creating a watertight, crushproof, and dustproof enclosure. Its reinforced lid-to-base corner points and four locking cleats enhance structural integrity and stacking strength, ensuring reliable protection and stable storage in demanding environments.

Exterior 

Measuring 53.5″ (L) × 16.05″ (H) × 6.13″ (W), the 1750’s exterior is molded from Pelican’s proprietary polypropylene with a reinforced open-cell core, delivering maximum structural strength and an impact-resistant, field-ready shell.

The 1750 is outfitted with four C-clamp ABS throw latches engineered for a tight, positive lock that compresses the O-ring gasket to maintain a fully watertight seal, even under impact or vibration. These heavy-duty latches, reinforced by stainless steel hinge pins, deliver long-term strength and secure closure in demanding environments. A folding mid-length handle and a top/bottom foldable handles ensure balanced carry and stable stacking during transport or storage.

The 1750 features stainless-steel padlock protectors built to resist cutting and prying, and include an automatic pressure-equalization valve with a 3-micron hydrophobic non-woven membrane to keep water out while balancing internal pressure. The padlock holes accept shackles up to 0.31″ (≈ 8 mm) in diameter, ensuring compatibility with most heavy-duty locks that fit securely through the reinforced protectors.

The 1750 is equipped with smooth-glide polyurethane wheels set in stainless-steel ball-bearing housings, delivering quiet, low-friction mobility over a variety of surfaces. The wheels are recessed into the base for protection against impact and feature a wide tread design that enhances stability and prevents wobble during transport, even when fully loaded.

Interior 

With an interior space of 50.38” (L) x 13.33” (H) x 5.33” (W), the 1750 has an overall internal storage capacity of 2.07 ft³.

A continuous EPDM O-ring gasket lines the lid of the 1750, creating a watertight, dustproof barrier when the latches are secured. Engineered for flexibility across extreme temperatures, this chemical-resistant seal upholds the case’s IP67 rating even through pressure changes or brief submersion. For lasting performance, Pelican recommends occasional cleaning of the O-ring channel and a light application of 100% silicone lubricant to maintain elasticity and peak sealing strength.

The Pelican 1750 comes with a three-piece foam set made from open-cell polyurethane, designed for customizable interior protection. It includes a solid base layer, a center layer, and a convoluted (egg carton) lid layer. This foam provides excellent shock absorption, dispersing impact and vibration during transport, while allowing a snug, tailored fit that keeps equipment secure. Fully removable and replaceable, the foam can be reconfigured or refreshed as needed to accommodate changing gear.

Specifications:

• Foam Layers………………..…1.63″ each
• Minimum Temperature…-40° F (-40 ° C)
• Maximum Temperature…210° F (99 ° C)
• Max Buoyancy Weight……136.91 lbs.
• The Protector series comes with Pelican’s Limited Lifetime Guarantee of Excellence

The 1750 Protector Long Case is available in Black (featured), Desert Tan, and OD Green.

Re-Set Kit for 1750 Protector Case

Released at SHOT Show in 2025, the Re-Set was Pelican’s answer in creating a reusable modular interior system, designed to provide customizable and secure organization within various Pelican long cases. Unlike the traditional foam inserts that require cutting or permanent modifications, the Re-Set system utilizes a grid of high-density foam pegs set into a plastic frame.

Included in each pre-assembled Re-Set are the necessary, 1″ diameter high-density foam pegs (with with a few extra). These can be pulled/pushed as necessary to form any required shape.

Support caps are used in conjunction with foam pegs in both key corners, and several mid-points to create the necessary negative space that allows for the custom dimensions.

Holding it all in its prescribed shape is a plastic grid with slots the same size as the diameter of the pegs themselves. The pegs slide with enough friction against the grid to ensure no accidental slippage, while retaining support and protection to the items inside. The Re-Set kit also comes with an alternative grid for optics with larger turrets. The configuration can be changed endlessly.

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Average (3/5): With an MSRP of $357.95, the Pelican Protector 1750 sits in the upper mid-range of Pelican’s larger Protector series. Its reinforced construction and dense polymer shell provide exceptional durability, designed specifically for the demands of law enforcement and military use. Following Pelican’s 2017 acquisition of its closest competitor, Hardigg, few brands now produce large-format cases with comparable structural integrity—further cementing Pelican’s position as a global leader in hard polymer protective cases. Comparable models in size include the VEVOR 50-inch IP67 Rifle Case ($108.99), the Eylar 50-inch XXL Deep Roller Case ($469.99), the Nanuk 996 Hard Case ($449.95), and the Plano 52-inch Long Gun Case ($199.99). Of these, only the Nanuk and Eylar cases approach Pelican in overall design quality and material strength, while the lower-priced VEVOR and Plano options trade off durability for affordability. Considering performance, build quality, and price across the market, the 1750 Protector occupies a balanced and justified position within its segment. When you include the cost of the Re-Set for the 1750 ($229.95) it can feel as if the total cost is rather steep for a hard case. But considering for every time the end-user custom cuts the interior foam and then changes the layout or rifle configuration, the 3-piece foam set itself needs to be re-ordered ($133.95). If, over the lifespan of the case, the end-user reconfigures the interior twice then the cost will have surpassed the cost of the Re-Set itself. So if the end-user is necessitating frequent reconfiguration of the rifle, putting the foam through excessive usage, or case interior, the Re-Set could easily offset the cost of endlessly cutting/re-cutting/replacing the foam interior.
• Comfort – Good (4/5): As a 53-inch single-rifle case with a slim, elongated profile and foldable handles, the Pelican 1750 offered a well-balanced combination of protection and portability. Despite its full-length design, the case remained easy to maneuver and never felt cumbersome when carried or lifted. Its interior dimensions provided sufficient space for a full-sized bolt-action rifle, carbine, shotgun, or short-barreled rifle (SBR), while still allowing room for accessories such as slings, magazines, or optics—depending on the configuration and overall size of the firearm. When fully loaded, the case naturally gained weight beyond its 26.7-pound base, but its limited internal depth effectively prevented overpacking and kept the total load within a manageable range. The dual foldable carrying handles were positioned to distribute weight evenly, minimizing hand strain during transport. Their ergonomic design provided a stable and secure grip whether the case was carried by hand or lifted into a vehicle. The integrated polyurethane wheels rolled smoothly and quietly across uneven terrain and hard surfaces, requiring minimal effort to move. Reinforced edges and deep locking cleats not only enabled secure stacking but also contributed to the case’s overall torsional rigidity, improving stability during transit. Together, these design elements gave the case a solid sense of balance and control while in motion. Overall, the Pelican 1750’s ergonomic features, reinforced construction, and efficient internal layout made it a practical, travel-ready option for users who frequently transported firearms or precision equipment—combining long-term durability with thoughtful, user-centered handling design.
• Durability – Good (4/5): The primary material used in the Pelican 1750 (as with most of Pelican’s Protector series) is its proprietary polypropylene copolymer resin, a specific type of high-density thermoplastic known for its exceptional impact resistance, structural rigidity, and chemical stability. This material contributes to the case’s ability to withstand heavy use, including drops, compression, and exposure to harsh environments (including UV light), without cracking or deforming. Its molded construction also incorporated an O-ring seal (which Pelican—or Peli as it is known overseas—has a maintenance recommendation for) and automatic pressure equalization valve, helping maintain watertight integrity and internal pressure balance when subjected to changes in altitude or temperature. Inside, the case featured open-cell polyurethane foam inserts, designed to cushion and stabilize stored equipment. The foam provided strong impact absorption and could be custom-cut (via “pick-and-pluck” sections or user trimming depending on choice at time of purchase) for a precise fit around rifles or accessories. However, as intended by design and over longer durations of time, the foam will tear or degrade somewhat easily after repeated reconfiguration—reflecting its purpose as a sacrificial, replaceable layer rather than a permanent interior lining. During testing, the case endured being dragged over rocks, thrown into a vehicle multiple times, and left exposed to rain and cold without any compromise to the foam or stored contents. Aside from minor external surface scuffs, there was no moisture or dust ingress or functional degradation observed. These results were consistent with Pelican’s IP67-rated performance claims. Each Pelican Protector case is backed by the manufacturer’s limited lifetime guarantee, which covers functional damage or defects for the life of the product—further underscoring the brand’s confidence in its long-term resilience. The Re-Set pegs themselves are made of a similar high-density foam as found in packaging of high-end firearm, medical, and other expensive products. Despite the close fit to the plastic matrix that holds the pegs, their continual friction points did not flake, erode, and otherwise damage the pegs—illustrating the tight tolerances between the two to allow movement/adjustment but not to be damaging.
• Functionality – Good (4/5): The Pelican 1750 followed a straightforward design: a rigid, foam-lined hard case that opened, closed, and locked securely. During use, it provided consistent protection for stored equipment, and the range of Pelican cases allowed users to select a size suited to their needs. The interior foam could be customized to fit specific  items. Once cut to a shape, the foam was less suitable for other items or its parts were exchanged unless a generalized pattern was used in the cutout. Optional accessories, such as the EZ-Click MOLLE Panels (not included in this review), could replace sections of foam on the lid and allow for mounting additional items, increasing flexibility. Features such as the polyurethane wheels and automatic pressure equalization valve improved portability and usability, especially when moving the case over longer distances or storing it in varying environmental conditions, such as those near coastlines or in temperate environments. The stainless-steel reinforced hasps and hinge pins added security and rigidity, making forced entry difficult without damaging the case. Overall, the case delivered consistent protection, transportability, and customizable storage. When setting up the Re-Set, it was helpful to have a large, flat surface to lay everything out. The pegs and plastic grid arrived pre-assembled and drop-in ready, which saved a great deal of time. Swapping the case’s foam and configuring peg positions was straightforward, and Pelican’s setup guide clearly explained the parts and installation. An alternative turret grid was useful for optics with large or bulky adjustment turrets, but with the Vortex scope on the ADM-10 and the lid foam in place—it wasn’t necessary. The only drawback if using the turret grid would be that users would need to physically transfer pegs between the grid types. Once the Re-Set was configured, the rifle never shifted, slipped, or moved during multiple trips. This was attributed to the smaller-diameter pegs that provided a tighter, more precise fit than Magpul’s larger DAKA grid organizer blocks. The Re-Set’s configurations were limited only by the case dimensions, and it could be reused indefinitely.
• Weight – Good (4/5): At 26.7 pounds (with all the included foam), the Pelican 1750 remained manageable by the foldable mid-length handle or on its top-mounted wheels, and fully loaded it stayed transportable with the wheels providing a practical alternative. The Re-Set kit for the 1750 weighed in at 7.9 pounds, which added slightly more to the case’s total weight even after removing the necessary case foam that weighed roughly 5 pounds. The multiple handles still made it easy to control the case even if the added items caused the case to become unbalanced. By comparison, the VEVOR 50-inch IP67 Rifle Case (weighed 18.85 pounds), the Eylar 50-inch XXL Deep Roller Case (32.5 pounds), the Nanuk 996 Hard Case (28 pounds), and the Plano 52-inch Long Gun Case (20 pounds). The 1750’s slightly higher weight reflects its reinforced construction and dense polypropylene shell, delivering a level of protection and rigidity that lighter cases do not provide.

Overall Rating – Above Average (19/25)

Product Link: https://www.pelican.com/us/en/product/cases/long-case/protector/1750/

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via High Ground Media, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.