High Ground Media, LLC

HESCO has a longstanding history of providing various Personal Protective Equipment, specifically its varied “series” of body armor, to the consumer. These series range from professional body armor utilizing complex composites, to affordable civilian ceramic models that still retain the same overall protective qualities—many of which still bear certification by the National Institute of Justice.

HESCO’s body armor comes in a variety of  “cuts” that define their applicability. This includes; Shooters Cut (SH), Law Enforcement Full Cut (LE), and SAPI Cut (SA). In the past HESCO has offered full-cut plates, but has since discontinued the design. All of HESCO’s plates are Multicurve (MC) and come in a range of sizes from Small to XLarge. Select models also include Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) materials or a polyurea coating for added mechanical abrasion resistance. All of HESCO’s plate models offer edge-to-edge protection, with some offering a 2mm thick bumper/padding around the outer edges of the plate for comfort and drop-protection.

800 Series

For the -800 Series designator, these plates constitute the flagship product for  HESCO body armor that blends lightweight materials to attain plates with NIJ Level III and IV certification (to include others with the non NIJ-recognized “+” and Special Threat profiles). Each plate is made with a composite core utilizing a water-resistant Honeywell composite called SPECTRA This material works to maintain the overall plate’s protective profile despite any effects of multiple strikes. Then the plate is enclosed in a water-resistant, polyurethane Cordura fabric that adds to the plate’s overall structure and durability. Depending on its size, NIJ rating, and cut, the -800 Series has a thickness between 0.67 and 1.12 inches, and a weight between 1.4 pounds (for a Small Shooter’s Cut plate) to 6.8 pounds (for an XL Level IV Standalone SAPI plate). It should be noted that the variance in weight between 800 models is due to differences in material with some made with ceramic, and not in others.

600 Series

Within the -600 Series, these plates are designed with added padding to be worn for longer durations or combat patrols while maintaining the full range of motion and protection needed. Available in Level III+ (which is to say is NIJ certified Level III, with the non-NIJ recognized “+” designator for an added protection profile provided by HESCO) and as a NIJ Level IV Stand Alone, this Series incorporates many of the same features as the -800 Series. Depending on its size, NIJ rating, and cut, the -600 Series has a thickness between 1.05 and 1.18 inches, and a weight between 4.1 pounds (for a Small Level III Shooters Cut plate) to 8.8 pounds (for an XL Level IV Standalone SAPI plate).

400 Series

As the more cost-effective solution for civilians, the -400 Series by HESCO is has a traditional ceramic core with a more cost-effective backer, and is enclosed in a 1000D Cordura nylon wrap. Available in NIJ Level III and as a NIJ Level IV Stand Alone, this Series incorporates some of the features as the -800 Series to include composite materials and rigidity. Depending on its size, NIJ rating, and cut, the -400 Series has a thickness between 0.93 and 1.22 inches, and a weight between 2.1 pounds (for a Small Level III Shooters Cut plate) to 9.1 pounds (for an Large Level IV Standalone SAPI plate).

200 Series

Promoted as a low-visibility, cost-effective means for the consumer to obtain light-weight body armor, the -200 Series offer a variety of specialized protective profiles for NIJ IIIA (handgun) and HESCO’s Special Threat capabilities for 5.56 and 7.62. Depending on its size, protective rating, and cut, the -200 Series has a thickness between 0.27 and 0.68 inches, and a weight between 0.6 pounds (for a Small Level IIIA Shooters Cut plate) to 7.8 pounds (for an XLarge Level Special Threat Standalone SAPI plate).

100 Series

Augmenting HESCO’s diverse product line are its -100 series of side armor that offers protective ratings from NIJ IIIA, III, and IV as well as HESCO’s III+ and Special Threat profiles. These augment plate carriers by increasing the protective surface area around the side of the torso that would otherwise expose vital areas to threats from the side. The side plates vary in dimension based on protective rating but consist of 5×7, 6×8, or 7×9 and can weigh as little as 0.3 pounds (for trauma plates) to 2.5 pounds (for single curve Level III+ side plate).

Specifications:

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Average (3/5): HESCO offers a large variety of protective plates, from the inexpensive -200 Series (the cheapest of which ranges between $150-$190 depending on retailer) to the more advanced -800 series (that can be upwards of $1300 per plate depending on retailer and threat profile). The defining aspect to the cost of HESCO plates is determined by the associated threat profile, materials, and cut/size/dimensions. For instance a Large Level IV 4800 Series plate ($1300) represents the higher or more exotic end of HESCO production, whereas a Large 4400 Series plate ($230) is slightly heavier, and made from more traditional ceramics and thus more affordable to civilians. In contrast, a Large Level IV 26148 Series Plate ($280) from LTC, a Level IV 4S17M Series Plate ($299) from Chase Tactical, or a Level IV 1155 Series Plate ($135) from RMA Defense illustrate that the diverse lineup of HESCO plates are at an appropriate (or average cost) to the consumer amid the current market of alternatives.
• Comfort – Good (4/5): The good overall comfort of HESCO plates stemmed from its curvature and weight to each plate. The latter of which also comes from the associated base materials. A majority of HESCO’s plates are multi-curved (a select few have only a single curve), which gave them a comfortable contour and good fit to the upper torso—with full range of motion capable in the arms and shoulder pocket. Obviously the plates made from UHMWPE were extremely lightweight, and even floated, but as Level III+ plates they lacked that full, Level IV protection found in other, heavier ceramic-based plates. The consumer should note the need to invest in the appropriately sized plate for their torso, so as to avoid the corners of the plates poking or digging unnecessarily. Moreover, the reality is that heavier plates will pull on the upper torso and shoulders more, but lighter plates (unless made from advanced materials) often lack more protective threat profiles so finding that right comfort level is a balance between weight, cost, and threat profile the consumer should consider.
• Durability – Good (4/5): From a durability aspect, HESCO’s products have all undergone extensive scientific testing and factory development, as well as testing from the National Institute of Justice. This ends with HESCO’s various plates appearing in the Compliant Product Listing of certified body armor. This meant that under controlled scientific settings; which includes a drop test, submersion test, and the ballistic test, the certified plates (Level III and IV) are known to defeat AT A MINIMUM the associated ballistic threat profiles. The durability of HESCO’s ballistic plates centered around its multi-layer design whereby plates like the -8/600 have a proprietary blend of HESCO core materials like SPECTRA, and an outer nylon layer that yields a consistent lighter weight ratio. The -400 series had the same multi-layer design, but had the traditional ballistic core of aluminum oxide ceramic, a fiberglass backer, and padding on the strike face wrapped in the more inexpensive Cordura nylon. Most Series also include a 2mm “bumper” of padding material around the outer edges to help prevent drop damage with the exclusion of plates made with a sprayed on polyurea coating. HESCO has had problems in the past in manufacturing, specifically in 2016, 2018, and most recently in 2019 with its 4600 and 3610 Series that could best be attributed to rapid growth demands and management issues. Since those issues were resolved, and HESCO addressed the issue by providing recall exchanges, HESCO has continued to be among the world supplier of body armor holding multiple government and private contracts.
• Functionality – Good (4/5): Consumers should remember how the NIJ’s certification on body armor translates to functionality, and what threats the consumer feels are most probable for their stated environment. Level IV plates for instance, have a very specific threat profile and are tested to precisely defeat projectiles traveling upwards AT A MAXIMUM of 3200fps at the point of impact. If projectiles are moving faster (such as with high velocity ammunition), there will more than likely be a penetration if the plate’s ballistic core cannot hold. So it makes sense for the consumer to carefully consider what function is needed out of their plates, as HESCO offers seven different models of ballistic plates at all NIJ ratings. Moreover, HESCO does offer 10 alternative plates with enhanced coverage (marked with either a “+” or “Special Threat” description) whereby they are manufactured to meet certain NIJ levels (such as Level III for rifle), but have added materials or composite to expand its protective threat level to include defeating other common calibers (such as 7.62×39) outside of the stated NIJ certified level. As a fair warning to the consumer, those enhanced coverage ratings are not certified by the NIJ, and are determined by the manufacturer (i.e. HESCO) through third-party laboratories. Furthermore, consumers need to be cognizant that trauma or comfort pads are highly recommended for thinner plates like the 200 Series, because while such plates are rated for a special threat (i.e. 5.56 at 3200fps) there is simply less material available to absorb the back face trauma into the chest and more padding or protection will mitigate the severe trauma from happening.
• Weight – Good (4/5): With 17 models of ballistic plates to choose from, HESCO plates ranged in weight from 0.6 pounds (for a Small -200 Series) to 9.1 pounds (for a Large -400 Series). Thus, there is a large variety of HESCO plates at various weights to consider. For instance, a Large Level IV 4800 Series plate (4.9 pounds) utilizes more advanced materials to keep the weight to a minimum, whereas a Large 4400 Series plate (7.9 pounds) is slightly heavier. In contrast, a Large Level IV 26148 Series Plate (8.76 pounds) from LTC, a Level IV 4S17M Series Plate (7.2 pounds) from Chase Tactical, or a Level IV 1155 Series Plate (8.3 pounds) from RMA Defense illustrate that HESCO’s plates are at a good weight within the current market having both excellent lightweight options, and average.

Overall Rating – Above Average (19/25)

Product Link: https://www.hesco.com

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

One overlooked aspect of tactical training or operations on the objective is the respiratory health of those in harms way. Yet with the dust, carbonized metal and lead, smoke and more—those individuals can inhale a lot of harmful particulates (even in well ventilated training houses). Over time this can translate to harmful health risks. The TR2 by O2 Tactical is one of only a few to consider these risks and works to minimize its exposure to those who work in harm’s way.

Introduced in 2020, the TR2 is the second generation of tactical respirators by O2 Tactical and is made from a combination of formed soft-touch, medical grade silicone, shaped ABS plastic, and a central raspatory filter.

The harnessing system consists of a continuous two-part head band that has a lower elastic nylon material for support and comfort, and the upper rubberized head band for retention. As the lower is expanded, the upper is cinched and vice versa. Overall length for the head band is adjusted via slide buckles on the upper band near the front face mask.

The front face of the TR2 features a base, contoured layer of medical grade silicone that is designed to fit around the mouth and nose during dynamic movement, while still maintaining a low enough profile to accommodate eyewear. There is even sufficient material to accommodate a proper seal with facial hair.

As part of the front face is a clip-on attachment that houses the principal air filter. The main intent for this filter is to prevent the inhalation of aerosolized lead from discharged ammunition. The filter itself is made from a material that is effective up to 98.8% at 0.3 microns. This means it will stop any airborne particulates found in the lead from gunfire discharge or suppressor use, asbestos, lubricant mist, dust, dirt, carbon from wildfires, and some airborne pathogens. In late 2020, O2 Tactical submitted for certification of its TR2 filter as N95 rated. Editor’s Note: It is important to note to the reader, the TR2 filter is not currently rated to filter out the COVID-19 virus, which is 0.125 microns but still offers comparable protections as N95 or other face masks.

Below the filter clip-on is a removable tube that allows the TR2 to be compatible with various Invisio® headsets for microphone integration and team communications using the associated O2 Tactical accessory (sold separately).

The TR2 is only available in Black (featured), and is a one-size-fits-most.

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Good (4/5): At a list price of $225 the TR2 is the latest rendition of tactical respirators from O2 Tactical, and involves an air filtration system that provides freedom of airflow and respiratory safety to those training or operating in enclosed areas. While the focus of the TR2 is for those in a tactical setting, the product also has potential applicability for civilians amid the ongoing COVID era. The only market alternative to the TR2 would be the Special Operations Tactical Respirator – SOTR ($300) by OpsCore/Gentex. Thus from a price point; and for its more minimalist design, the TR2 is at a good value for its functionality.
• Comfort – Average (3/5): It took a little time to find the appropriate balance between expanding/cinching the TR2’s harness system that allowed for a good seal, and was still comfortable. The sliding buckles did provide a solid adjustment to the overall length of the harness without any slippage. The TR2 silicone had a comfortable contour around the mouth and nose, although felt unstable as the lower portion of the TR2’s design rests on the Mentolabial Crease (that spot between your lower lip and the chin) rather than extending down to enclose the entire chin. The result was a secure seal only as long as the wearer was not extending the jaw (such as to opening the mouth to talk or shout), but when maximum range of motion was applied, the mask would lose some of its seal and stability. It is recommended to O2 Tactical to address this in subsequent future designs so that the chin is enclosed and the overall mask maintains its seal for all range of motion. Airflow through the filter was easy and uninterrupted, even when conducting dynamic movements (sprints).
• Durability – Good (4/5): From a durability aspect, the main material in the TR2 was the medical grade silicone, which was both flexible and resistant to abrasion. This is the same material that is in military NBC masks and known for its resistance to oil, solvents, corrosion, and puncture. And similarly, the silicone material in the TR2 heavily attracted lint and other particulates, but that didn’t affect fit or seal. Separately, O2 Tactical detailed that the TR2’s filter was only good for an estimated 40hr of wear time. This was dependent on the atmosphere involved with dust and larger particulates obviously clogging the filter material quicker. A recent study of the TR2 also revealed that the respirator did survive drop testing of 120 times from a height of 1m without any damage to the unit, and the multi-fabric head harness had a lateral sheer strength between 20 and 30 pounds depending on the material tested. All of this far exceeds what the casual user would experience in training or in the field.
• Functionality – Average (3/5): Functionally, the TR2 provided an overall good flow of oxygen to the user, despite the intake passing through a filter and in an enclosed seal. Some minimal beading of moisture on the interior of the unit, and around the filer, was noted after an hour of continual and dynamic wear, but was to be expected and common with this type of device. Removal of the clip-on attachment at the face of the respirator, and replacing the filter was easy to do. However, re-attaching the filter/clip while wearing the mask was somewhat challenging as it relied on alignment of the retention clips that cannot be observed nor felt while wearing the mask. This resulted in several instances where it did not fully seat. This problem was easily resolved by simply removing the mask to remove/replace/reattach the components prior to time on the range or in operation (something that each filter’s 40 hour lifespan could easily handle). The minimalist profile of the mask did allow for comfortable wear of eyewear without fogging as well as shouldering a rifle, all while maintaining a proper seal. The one aspect of function that was concerning was the rigid plastic tab supporting the area of material over the bridge of the nose. This rigid piece did not contour/flex to the nose very well, and could potentially jab the wearer in the soft tissue of the face or around the eye if a frontal impact was experienced. It is recommended to O2 Tactical that if the overall area of silicone material were expanded, as discussed in the Comfort section above, this area of the nose could be thickened and not rely on a rigid plastic spur for structure. Other areas of recommended improvement would be alternative harness/mounting designs to allot for quick attach/detach and/or direct attachment to hook-and-loop panels of a helmet. As is, in its current design the TR2 can only be worn under a helmet or headwear, and can only be removed by first removing the headgear.
• Weight – Good (4/5): With an overall weight of 5.1 ounces (the filter alone accounting for 0.5 ounces) the TR2 was very lightweight and did not detract from the front of the face, nor pull excessively on the neck or muscles over time. Indeed, properly fitted the TR2 hung effortlessly. In contrast, the SOTR (16 ounces) is more than double the weight, but is due to the fact it is more encompassing of the face with a much larger air filer. Thus for its minimalist design and overall function, the TR2 has a good level of light overall weight for the consumer and within the market.

Overall Rating – Above Average (18/25)

Product Link: https://www.o2tactical.com/products/tr2-tactical-respirator-ii

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Introduced in early 2018, the TLR-8 by Streamlight was an adaptation of the TLR-7 but with the added benefit of an optional red or green laser. Designed to fit with compatible conceal carry-sized handguns, the TLR-8 offers professional, competitive, and individual shooters with a steady source of light and pinpoint reference in an otherwise dark environment.

Compact in design, the TLR-8 was an improvement over the previous TRL-4 models in both appearance, size, and light output (measured as lumens). Its 6000 Series aircraft-grade aluminum housing ensures the light’s robust ability to withstand heavy usage.

In 2019, Streamlight added a new switch design to the TLR-8, designated the TLR-8A FLEX that allows for ambidextrous operation with the support hand by pressing forward on the rear-mounted high or low switch control. This is an evolution over the previous butterfly-style switch of the TLR-1 through 4, or the side buttons of the TLR-7. Each FLEX comes with both switch controls to allow the user to choose which best suits their preferred style. The FLEX rear-mounted switch controls allow the operator to select between three modes: Laser Only, Light Only, Both Laser/Light. Once selected, the additional strobe function for the light can be selected (if activated) by double tapping either switch within a ¼ second. The custom light optic produces 500 lumens (or 4,300 candela) in a narrow beam with peripheral illumination that reaches 140 meters before dispersal. In front of the optic, the TLR-8A glass is a Borofloat high temperature glass designed to have a high degree of heat and impact/abrasion resistance.

The TLR-8A FLEX is powered by a single CR123 lithium battery that provides the light/laser an average 1.5 hours of continual runtime, or 60 hours with just the laser only. The battery compartment is sealed via rubberized gasket to avoid penetration of moisture. A special design feature of the FLEX includes the same “Safe ON/OFF” design built into the facecap of the lens as the TLR-8 and TLR-7 that prevents accidental activation.

A series of different mounting keys are provided with the FLEX that provides platform compatibility across a wide variety of handgun platforms.

The FLEX has an overall measurement of 2.58” (L) x 1.18” (W) x 1.50” (H) and an operating range between -20 degrees Fahrenheit, to 120 degrees. It is sealed against moisture thanks to a rubber gasket and enclosed housing to provide waterproofing. It should be noted that the TLR-8 series is the red/green laser variant of the TLR-7.

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Good (4/5): At an MSRP of $236.99 the price online can vary depending on retailer and availability of sales/coupons. At the time of this writing it is available for as little as $194.05 on third-party sites, but take care. Overseas counterfeits of weapon lights proliferate sites like Ebay and Amazon. For the MSRP, the TLR-8A FLEX is well below the cost of a Surefire XC1-B (the closest comparable competitor at $299 with 300 lumens) and almost half the size. Alternatively, the Olight Baldr Pro ($149.95) is a more reasonable choice economically, but at twice the bulk.
• Comfort – Good (4/5): Very light. In comparison to other weapon lights that lead the industry, the TLR-8 FLEX was almost half the weight and was hardly noticeable on the end of the pistol. There has been some Interweb debate on the designs of previous Stremlight switches, requiring the support thumb to come down and to either press inward or down, negatively effecting shot placement. However, the new FLEX switch design allowed the user to continue supporting the firearm in a natural position and driving the support thumb slightly forward. The size of the individual’s hands and grip dictated the choice of a high or low switch.
• Durability – Excellent (5/5): Amazingly durable. The course of fire selected for testing the FLEX involved 10 magazines, each with 10 rounds, at a 15-meter target. Between magazine changes the light was struck a number of times on the housing and lens cap with the ejecting magazine before a new one was loaded. The process repeated itself until all rounds were fired. At no point did the TLR-8A light flicker or fail in the firing process, nor drift from center mass. The testing did result in some minor (cosmetic) surface scratches, but nothing that would impact the functionality of the light.
• Functionality – Good (4/5): Aside from the traditional ON/OFF and momentary light functions, the TLR-8A FLEX has an optional strobe feature that comes from the factory disabled. The laser also came from the factory engaged, so out of the box both light and laser functions are available. It took some time to try the different high and low rear switch options for the FLEX, and find one that was most comfortable. For the user with larger hands on a compact handgun (in this instance a Gen 5 Glock 19 was used) the high switch proved a more comfortable option with its taller profile, and with less distance (however minor) needed to move the thumb down and forward to engage the switch. Smaller hands may like the low switch option, as it enabled the switch to be directly in line with the thumb and thus drive the thumb forward into the switch. In all, preference was determined by the user, and the only way to figure out which option worked best was through trial and error. The FLEX switch design differs from previous switch designs in its alignment with the thumb allowed the support hand to retain its support while still actioning the switch. This is not to say it was better, nor worse than other Streamlight designs—just a different alternative. It was a little tricky to get the rapid nine clicks of the control switch fast enough, then hold the 10^th to engage the strobe feature. But once engaged, the strobe easily functioned on the second press of the switch as designed. Disengaging the strobe feature was again little tricky, but after a few tries was successful. The TLR-8A FLEX also had the same “Safe ON/OFF” feature as the TRL-7 that had a tangible/audible click at the detent that indicates it is “Safe” or fully engaged. In essence you are unscrewing the battery connection to the point (or detent) that the connection to the battery became separated. It was a nice feature in application that clearly limited the risk of negligent light discharge when the weapon light is not in use. One notable positive of the TLR-8 (or other dual light/laser combos) was that although the light did disperse as distance increased, the laser dot remained clear and crisp. This could be of an added benefit for family members who are perhaps unfamiliar with WML or handgun function and use the laser as an impromptu point of aim.
• Weight – Good (4/5): Weighing a mere 2.64 ounces (with provided battery) the TLR-8A weighs about one ounce more than the Surefire XC1-B (1.6 ounces), but provided 200 more lumens. The Olight Baldr Pro (4.55 ounces) was nearly double in weight and drew upon two power cells for its function. In comparison, the TLR-8A weighs half of a TLR-1 but also provided 200 more lumens. Thus, when considering the current market of available weapon lights, the TLR-8 and 8A FLEX were under the average weight of other legacy devices (including other Streamlight units), but comparable to newer models. The weight did not pull the muzzle of the handgun down nor have a notable impact to target acquisition while firing.

Overall Rating – Good (21/25)

Product Link: https://www.streamlight.com/en/products/detail/index/tlr-8-a

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.