Review Posted: Bullseye Sight In Target Camera: Spend More Time Shooting and Less Time Walking

With its 300-yard range and smart device applications, the “Sight-In Edition” is ideal for a broad range of shooters either checking on their zero prior to hunting season, or challenging themselves out to an interim distance.

Review Posted: Viktos Bersherken Jacket: Inspired by Viking Lineage

As part of its Fall 2020 outer wear line, the Bersherken Jacket by Viktos brings together the successful features of the previous Gunfighter outerwear line, with newer martials and a design that increases function and comfort.

Review Posted: Safariland 6304 v 7304 Holsters: Head to Head

Recently released, the 6304RDS (RDS standing for Red Dot Sight) and the 7304RDS Drop-Rig holsters by Safariland are among the newest of the Automatic Locking System (ALS) series of holsters. While each features some of the same fundamental aspects that lend themselves to the Safariland legacy, each is slightly tailored to a different end user.

Review Posted: MantisX Elite Training Device: Training With Technology

Scoring a total of 22 points out of 25 possible, the MantisX Elite did well for its excellent showing in durability, function, and weight. For full details read our complete review.

Review Posted: Pelican Dayventure Backpack: The Modern Personal Cooler

Introduced in early 2019, the Dayventure is one of several additions to Pelican’s line of portable coolers and is designed as a dual-strap, backpack carry.

New SSE Shirt Drop – “Just So We’re Clear”…

It came in an epiphany as I watched the Election Night results come in detailing Biden as the President Elect. I recalled his “plan” to curb gun violence and “weapons of war”. […]

Review Posted: Lantac BMD Gen 2: Muzzle that Brake!

The Lantac Blast Mitigation Device (BMD) Gen 2 marks the second iteration of the company’s barrel shroud design, and a total change from its predecessor. Scoring 18 out of 25 points possible, the BMD 2 did well in its performance for its good level of comfort, durability and function.

Review Posted: Emdom Recon Waist Bag: The Tactical Fanny

Capable as a stand-alone waist bag, with enough durability to augment a full kit in the field, the Recon Waist Bag by Emdom USA offers the user added storage of critical resources or accessories within easy reach.

Review Posted: Emdom Expandable Hanger Pouch: When Those Little Pouches Just Won’t Do

Designed as an additional pouch for under a plate carrier’s front carriage, the Expandable Hanger Pouch by Emdom USA provides for additional storage of critical necessities well within reach.

Review Published: SB Tactical SBM4: Remaining a Solid Option

The SBM4 is one of the original AR pistol braces offered by SB Tactical, and among many along its AR, AK, and shotgun models.

Testimonials

View All ›

Hazard 4 Plan C: For Life, Range, or Field

Introduced in 2016 as a slim, modular backpack, the Plan C is part of the Hazard 4 line of dual-strap backpacks. Similar to the Patrol, the Plan C offers a functional pack that is ideal for range, field, or daily life and can be expanded through the attachment of additional pouches (sold separately).

Made from 1000D Cordura and treated for water repellence, the Plan C is a continuation of the Plan B, a single strap variant that allows for cross-shoulder carry. However, in the Plan C the 20” (H) x 8” (L) x 7” (D) pack has a dual strap design that allows for a more traditional carry.

Exterior

Starting at the front, the top of the Plan C features the same 6.7″ (H) x 3.1″ (W) x 2.4″ (D) type of thermoformed shell storage pocket as the Patrol, which is secured via dual zippers.

Below the thermoformed pocket is a 11.8″ (H) x 6.7″ (W) x 1.8″ (D) accessory pocket with several sleeve pockets for smaller, immediate need items. The exterior of the lower accessory pocket has laser-cut MOLLE and (female) hook-and-loop fields.

Both sides of the Plan C feature an extensive, top-to-bottom field of MOLLE webbing with a pocket on either side for a water bottle. Dual compression straps with slide release buckles help ensure the weight remains secure.

IMG_4958

On the top, the Plan C includes dual access ports into the main storage compartment for hydration bladders or communication wiring. A reinforced carry handle is on both the top and bottom for a variety of stowage configurations.

The backpanel has the same thermoformed material to create five padded panels configured to create airflow and improve breathability. The dual shoulder straps are anchored at the top of the backpanel using X-pattern reinforcement stitching. The shoulder straps include hook-and-loop retention tabs for hydration tubes, and webbing segments to either hang a variety of accessories or reposition the sternum strap. Behind the thermoformed backpanel is a 19.7″ (H) x 6.7″ (W) x 0.6″ (D) zipper-secured storage compartment for either a 3L hydration bladder, tablets or documents.

Interior

The main storage compartment is accessed via dual zippers, and includes mesh pockets on both the interior and support side of the pack. The interior sides are also lined with a velour material that allows the internal divider (with (male) hook-and-loop panels) to be adjusted based on the user’s needs at the time.

Specifications:

  • 1000D Cordura
  • YKK zippers with paracord pull tabs
  • Thermoformed storage pocket

The Plan C is available in either Coyote (featured) or Black.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • CostGood (4/5): At $176.65 the Plan C is intended to be a moderate-sized, modular backpack that allows the user to have either a slim day pack, or plenty of fields by which to add MOLLE-based pouches for added functionality. Being made from 1000D Cordura, for its size and YKK zippers the Plan C is at a good price point for its materials. Alternative market comparisons could be made to Eberlestock’s Switchblade ($199), 5.11’s Covert M4 Backpack ($129.95), or the Noveske Discreet Backpack ($236) by First Spear. While other backpacks, often at a higher price, maintain a more urban profile, they often do so at a sacrifice to the opportunity to expand the pack. Additionally, source of manufacturing and hardware also play into overall market prices, and as such the Plan C is well priced among its competitors.
  • Comfort Good (4/5): With a moderate level of closed cell foam padding in the shoulders, and the thermoformed back panels, the Plan C was comfortable to wear. The narrow design helped ensure it stayed between the shoulders regardless of weight distribution. It was unlikely the user could overload the pack beyond the point of comfort since the main storage area is of moderate size. Carrying an AR pistol, broken down, was easy and the storage compartment allotted for the pistol’s components as well as some extra space. All the YKK zippers opened/closed smoothly, although it would have been preferred for the paracord pull tabs to be either rubberized or anchored in a plastic cap for tactile control.
  • Durability – Excellent (5/5): The 1000D Cordura had a significant level abrasion resistance as needed for life on the range or in the field. Throughout the Plan C, bartack and X-type stitching was noted reinforcing the shoulder strap connection points, drag handles, as well as zippers and MOLLE webbing. All zippers functioned easily and smoothly, and the coils did not cross thread (though it would be an improvement to use a thicker zipper coil in the future). The velour interior made for easy adjustment of the interior divider, though over time that (male) hook-and-loop material may begin to wear the velour down to where it is less secure. Throughout evaluations, no lose threads or popped stitching were noticed.
  • Functionality Good (4/5): As a modular, light backpack the Plan C provided a plethora of opportunity. It had sufficient size to serve as an EDC pack, or held balanced MOLLE fields on the sides and front to expand the Plan C into a more robust backpack. The thermoformed storage pocket provided sufficient protection to sensitive items that still needed immediate access, such as electronics or a GPS. All zippers had an excess strip of material to cover the zipper from moisture and limit the risk of potential saturation along those lines. A recommendation for Hazard 4 would be the inclusion of a compression/retention strap in the interior of the main storage compartment. While the use of the internal divider was helpful, it did not give that solid retention to secure the contents and was more intended to divide the interior for smaller items.
  • Weight Average (3/5): Coming in at 2.2 pounds (empty) the Plan C was a very lightweight and balanced light/moderate backpack, that gave the wearer the option to expand…provided it was done evenly. If weight or pouches were added to the front exterior laser-cut MOLLE, this addition in weight was more or less unnoticeable. However, if you added the pouch to only one side of MOLLE panels, and not both for equal balance of overall weight, then the disparity was readily apparent. This should be in mind when the user opts to expand the Plan C. In comparison the Eberlestock’s Switchblade (3.10 pounds), and 5.11’s Covert M4 Backpack (2.2 pounds) are both of a more of a traditional design and material for low-profile backpacks, whereas the Noveske Discreet Backpack (0.44 pounds) utilizes more lightweight and commercial materials to maintain that discrete appearance. This would place the Plan C at an appropriate (or average) weight for its materials and design within the current market.

Overall Rating – Good (20/25)

Product Link: https://www.hazard4.com/packs/day-packs/plan-c.html

IMG_2889I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

 

Urban Warfare Double Rifle Bag: An In-Depth Review

The Urban Warfare Double Rifle Bag by Savior Equipment offers ideal protection and smart storage in a sleek, low-profile design built for serious shooters. With its reinforced stitching, upgraded padding, and configurable compartments, it securely carries multiple firearms and essential gear while remaining durable and easy to transport.

The Urban Warfare is built from upgraded 600D polyester throughout both exterior and interior panels. Reinforced stitching and bartac stress points enhance durability at load-bearing areas such as strap anchors and handle mounts.

Heavy-duty KAM zippers with extended pulls are used to allow ease of operation, even while wearing gloves, and the padded structure maintains rigidity to protect optics, mounted lights, and other external rifle accessories.

Exterior

At its front, the Urban Warfare includes an expanded storage layout designed to consolidate essential range equipment. At center, a secondary compartment includes two padded pistol sleeves and two mesh packets (zipper-secured) for storing support items. The front of the compartment includes two zipper-secured flat admin pockets and an exterior field of laser-cut MOLLE.

On either side of the secondary storage compartment is an accessory pocket used for holding bulkier items, such as ammo boxes, hearing protection, and more. The pocket is secured using an adjustable slide-release buckle.

Primary carry for the case is supported through joined, padded handles that can be secured with the hook-and-loop collar, allowing balanced hand carry when the case is fully loaded. Compression straps run along the exterior to stabilize internal contents and reduce shifting during movement.

For heavier loadouts, the case incorporates a padded, adjustable shoulder strap that can be configured for cross-body carry.

Where the Urban Warfare differentiates itself is with its integrated backpack strap system on the rear of the case. The padded straps allow users to modify the strap placement and distribute weight evenly across both shoulders — a major advantage when transporting multiple rifles, ammunition, and accessories over longer distances such as parking areas, training facilities, or match venues.

Reinforced drag handles on the rear of the case are positioned at key points to assist with vehicle loading and unloading.

Interior

The Urban Warfare utilizes a full clamshell opening design, allowing the case to lay completely flat when opened. This feature significantly improves accessibility when loading, unloading, or staging firearms.

Inside the case are dual padded rifle compartments, each lined with protective foam and supported by hook-and-loop retention straps that secure firearms in place during movement.

A removable padded center divider separates the two rifle bays. This divider prevents optic-to-optic or firearm-to-firearm contact while in transit. When removed, it can double as a padded work surface or shooting mat in field or range settings.

The interior layout reflects a focus on modular staging — allowing users to configure firearms and support gear based on mission or range requirements.

The Urban Warfare Double Rifle Bag is available between 36” length to 55”, and comes in Dark FDE (featured), OD Green, Grey, and Black.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • Cost – Good (4/5): The Urban Warfare Double Rifle Case ($109.97 to $164.97 based on size selected) sits in the mid-range price tier for rifle storage, generally falling between budget soft cases and premium tactical rifle hard carriers, with pricing that reflects its upgraded build quality for soft nylon cases. Constructed from heavy-denier, double layer 600D nylon fabric with reinforced stitching, padded internal divider, and quality hardware, its materials provide greater durability and firearm protection than most entry-level nylon alternatives. Positioned slightly above entry-level double rifle soft cases, the Urban Warfare justifies its price through expanded storage, upgraded nylon materials, and multi-mode (shoulder-to-back) carry capability. When factoring the ability to replace both a rifle case and range bag, the value becomes more apparent. Its closest competitors in terms of price, materials, and feature set include the 5.11 Tactical Double Rifle Case ($180), Condor Double Rifle Case ($120), and Bulldog Deluxe Double Tactical Rifle Case ($98), all of which target the same balance of protection, storage, and transport versatility.
  • Comfort – Good (4/5): From a comfort aspect, the case proved comfortable to carry even during extended transport, thanks to its padded and adjustable backpack straps that distributed weight evenly across the shoulders. The two reinforced grab handles and joining collar provided additional carry options without digging into the hands when lifting heavier overall loads. When transitioned to shoulder carry, the shoulder strap provided a similar good overall comfort while not being unbalancing. The case’s lowered profile, and balanced design prevented excessive shifting of rifles and gear during movement, reducing strain on the user. The KAM zippers moved smoothly, all be it a little stiff at first use, and will likely improve over time and use. Its removable padded divider allowed customization of internal layout, keeping weight distribution consistent and preventing pressure points. Overall, the combination of padded straps, ergonomic handles, and thoughtful internal organization contributed to a carrying experience that minimized fatigue and maintained mobility.
  • Durability – Good (4/5): The durability of the double rifle case demonstrated robust longevity under repeated use, with high-stress areas reinforced through bartac stitching, reverse-stitched seams, and Hypalon segments to prevent seam friction or failure. Its double-layer 600D polyester nylon exterior and interior fabric was chemically bonded to resist abrasion associated to transport, tearing, and general wear during use and range handling. Dual angled padded rifle sleeves and the removable padded divider-maintained firearm separation and reduced stress on the overall case structure, preserving internal integrity over time. Lockable zipper sliders and compression straps helped to reinforce the carry handles and served to minimize hardware failure while supporting heavier rifles and accessories. The overall protective value was a good fit within the market of alternative soft cases, but end users should not mistake that these cases do not offer the overall level of protective durability that hard cases offer, which are intended to address different field-use cases.
  • Functionality – Good (4/5): The Urban Warfare Double Rifle Case proved highly functional in field testing, with dual rifle compartments and the removable padded divider that accommodated a variety of rifle sizes/configurations while the internal angled pockets and hook-and-loop straps kept rifles firmly secured and prevented them from rotating while in transport or setting the bag down. The padded edges of the rifle storage compartments not only mitigated impact and protected stored firearms, but also added structural rigidity that prevented the case from collapsing when partially loaded or staged upright. External accessory pockets and MOLLE-compatible panels allowed for organized storage of ammunition, optics, additional pouches, and range gear, reducing the need for additional bags. However, accessing the items in the flat pistol pockets was somewhat difficult when rifles inside the bag was pressed against it and compressing the closure. Lockable KAM zippers and reinforced carry handles provided secure closure and versatile carry options, while padded backpack straps made transporting two rifles and gear comfortable over longer distances. Its low-profile, balanced design minimized bulk without compromising protection, and the structured interior maintained firearm and accessory positioning during transport. Overall, the case combined protection, versatility, and mobility, making it an effective solution for both range trips and field operations.
  • Weight – Average (3/5): From the perspective of weight, the Urban Warfare Double Rifle Case came in heavier than several comparable soft cases, averaging approximately 7.5–8.5 lb (depending on selected overall length at time of purchase), compared to the 5.11 Tactical Double Rifle Case (6–6.8 lb size dependent), the Condor Double Rifle Case (5.5–6 lb), and the Bulldog Deluxe Double Tactical Rifle Case (4.5–5.5 lb). The increased weight was largely attributable to thicker padded rifle sleeves, a full-length divider, reinforced stitching, and higher-denier shell materials that enhanced structural rigidity and long-term durability. Expanded external storage, internal accessory organization, and semi-rigid padding further contributed to mass, reflecting its role as both a dual-rifle carrier and consolidated range transport system. When loaded, padded adjustable backpack straps played a significant role in mitigating perceived weight by distributing the load evenly across both shoulders rather than concentrating stress on a single carry point. A sternum strap and balanced strap placement improved stability during movement, limiting sway and reducing fatigue over distance. Reinforced grab handles provided an alternative hand-carry method that remained comfortable under heavier loads. Overall, while heavier on the scale, the case’s carry architecture effectively offset its mass, making the added weight functionally justified in practical field use.

Overall Rating – Above Average (19/25)

Product Link: https://www.saviorequipment.com/collections/rifle-bags/products/urban-warfare-double-rifle-case

An animated character wearing tactical gear, headphones, and glasses, with a serious expression, set against a wooden background.

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via High Ground Media, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Shadow Fast Fit Tactical Gloves: Protect the Digits

Designed as a lightweight, breathable and tactical glove for use in varying conditions the Shadow Elite Fast Fit Tactical Gloves by The Requirements Group (TRG) give the shooter not only an added layer of protection, but keep their tactile sense and dexterity.

Made with a synthetic leather palm and printed silicone padding in key areas, the Fast Fit (FF) gloves are one of several varieties in hand protection offered by TRG. The design of the silicone “Gel” and other foam-padded areas will reduce friction and impact. Elsewhere, the fingers and palm feature silicone prints for added grip.

The backhand material to the FF gloves comprises of Nylon Lycra, a lightweight and moisture wicking mesh, that affords flexibility and breathability. The index finger and thumb also feature touch-pad sensitive tips that are compatible with most touch-based electronics.

The FF gloves will secure above the wrist bone by an adjustable hook-and-loop strap. Inside of the wrist strap are two retention lanyards.

Sizes range from Small to XXL, and come in Coyote (featured) or Black.

Product Evaluation Scores:

  • CostGood (4/5): At $18.20 the FF gloves are very will priced considering the materials and design. In comparison to other similar shooter-style gloves, the Fast Fit actually cost less for the same design used by other manufacturers.
  • Comfort Good (4/5): The flexibility and breathability in the backhand material make the gloves very flexible when donning or removing. There is also a an added guset material between the thumb and forefinger that improves the range of motion.
  • Durability – Average (3/5): Given the thickness of the lycra/leather materials, these gloves will most likely only last sustained hard use for a short time, much like SKD’s PIGs, and then need replacing. But that is per design and not an indictment against the Fast Fits. Gloves that have greatest tactile function like the FF gloves will wear out over hard use. One notable issue however, was the hook-and-loop of the wrist strap on one glove will catch and fray the material of the other glove between the leather and lycra when contacted.
  • Functionality – Good (4/5): Overall the Fast Fit gloves functioned as intended as shooter gloves. Positive tactile sensation was maintained to the trigger and dexterity during magazine changes and function drills were not impaired. It would be nice if the retention lanyards were made of parachord rather than a thin strip of material, as using them for storage or to assist donning the gloves feels frail at best. The only negative note would be the touchscreen pads were difficult to use as the contact pad on the glove moved to the side while wearing them, but would still function.
  • Weight Average (3/5): At 2.2 ounces for the pair, the FF gloves are actually lighter than SKDs or Mechanix variant of the same glove. But otherwise its weight is comparable to other similar style shooter gloves.

Overall Rating – Above Average (18/25)

Product Link: https://therequirementsgroup.com/she-2369/

IMG_2889I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.