High Ground Media, LLC

Blending innovative technology and design with traditional tactical function, the QD-NVL (V2) by LeonWorx Solutions is a retention system for night vision devices that provides a solid lock and safety to otherwise very valuable sensitive items.

Using the sewable V-Buckle 25 by Fidlock, the V2 is the second version LeonWorx’s unique QD-NVL retention lanyard for securing night vision to helmets that uses a magnetized lift opening mechanism. This mechanism itself has a static breaking load of 588 newtons (a measurement of force), or 60kg (or 132lb) and can only be actioned if the proper lift angle is utilized.

At the base, the QD-NVL (V2) utilizes a double-layer panel of 2” (W) x 3” (L) 17337 Mil Spec solution-dyed Cordura nylon webbing, with hook-and-loop (male) on the bottom for attaching to corresponding hook-and-loop panels on helmets or covers.

On three sides of the QD-NVL (V2) are nylon pass-through loops for threading shock or paracord through for added security. Additionally, an elastic nylon cuff is behind the V-Buckle for spare battery storage.  

The fourth (front) side of the QD-NVL (V2) is reserved for a 1” tab that allots for shock cordage to attach to the night vision device, and can be adjusted via press-button slide lock.

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Good (4/5): With a list price of $44.99, the QD-NVL offers a unique locking mechanism to secure an end-user’s night vision device to their helmet’s preferred hook-and-loop panel or covers. Considering the dollar value of many night vision devices, any added security serves as a beneficial insurance against slippage or damage to the retention arm that could potential cause the night vision to fall off. The Fidlock buckle itself is a $25 value, and from a European company that specializes in biking and sport retention locks. The bottom of the QD-NVL also utilizes industrial hook-and-loop (male) to ensure positive connection. The closest market comparator to the QD-NVL would be the Nightvision Elastic Retention Device ($35) by Kinetic Consulting, or the SBL NVG Lanyard ($35) by T.REX Arms, but both are only a simple hook-and-loop panel and lack the mechanical locking mechanism of the QD-NVL. Wilcox does offer an NVG mechanical Lanyard ($68.14) but those are simple spring-tension lanyards that mount directly into specific helmet NVG shrouds. Thus, the QD-NVL (V2) is at a good price point amid the market, offering significant security over other retention lanyards with a balanced price for the hardware included.  
• Comfort – Good (4/5): From a comfort aspect, the QD-NVL (V2) was simplistic in approach, came pre-assembled, and attached easily. The industrial hook-and-loop did provide a noticeably stronger than typical connection to the corresponding panels on both the helmet and helmet cover. The locking mechanism of the V-Buckle 25 itself broke easily when the pull tab was pulled directly outward/up, but remained locked firmly when pulled forward (such as if the NVGs broke free of the mount and suddenly placed increased tension/load on the front of the device). The strength of the V-Buckle 25 was such that it could fully support the weight of a loaded helmet (i.e. with earpro, NVGs, light/accessories) freely and without any slippage. The magnetic element inside the base of the V-Buckle 25 allowed for easy realignment and rehoming of the release mechanism, without any measurable effort, to re-engage the lock.
• Durability – Average (3/5): With its base 17337 Mil Spec material made from double-layer solution-dyed nylon webbing, the QD-NVL (V2) had a somewhat pliable base that contoured to the curvature of the helmet easily. The fabric itself had typical (or average) abrasion resistance amid the nylon gear market, and held up with expected usage. Despite continual re-adjustment, the hook-and-loop (male) material, nor threading, showed any signs of premature wear or excessive fraying. Over time, the shock cord will need to be replaced simply due to exposure and wear (typical for this type of material). Otherwise, the V-Buckle 25 had a max load capacity of over 100 pounds and kept producing the same level of secure lock over the term of usage, and showed no signs of wear at the edges of the aluminum or weakening of the magnet.
• Functionality – Good (4/5): Functionally, the QD-NVL (V2) came down to a good level of added strength and retention as a safety backup to the NVG mount. The V-Buckle 25 locking mechanism was able to support the full weight of the overall helmet, while freestanding only off the locking mechanism’s pull tab—yet it still did not slip unless the tab was pulled as intended. Elsewhere, the elastic cuff for battery storage was initially very tight, but that was ideal considering it was the only measure securing the spare battery. It could easily fit other items like full-sized chemlight. The side nylon loops were intended for tying additional retention/paracord to the QD-NVL (V2) for added security, but without other accessories like a battery pack/Mohawk/earpro helmet mounts for hardpoint connections, they offered only slot space for mini chemlights. The only notable aspect from a negative functional perspective was that when the night vision was deployed downward, and the greatest level of tension was exerted on the shock cord and QD-NVL (V2), the rear edges of the nylon fabric would curl or pull on the helmet cover fabric. It was never enough to cause the hook-and-loop to begin separating, but noticeable because it displayed how that tension was being carried through the QD-NVL (V2). Those with the longer band of hook-and-loop on their helmets/covers will most likely experience less of this effect, unless positioning the QD-NVL (V2) further to the rear of the helmet, and thus placing more tension on the cordage and body of the locking mechanism. A recommendation to LeonWorx would be to consider adding a grommet at the rearward portion of the QD-NVL (V2) so that it could serve as an alternative tie-down point if the nylon loops were otherwise not available.
• Weight – Average (3/5): Weighing in at 1.8 ounces, a majority of the (minuscule) weight to the QD-NVL (V2) was from the overall double layer of 17337 nylon and shock cord. The retention lanyard as a whole was not noticeable when mounted on the helmet, did not shift, nor was unbalancing. However, the inclusion of a mechanical locking mechanism (rated to over 100 pounds) added slightly to the overall product weight as opposed to only a hook-and-loop panel. In contrast, the Nightvision Elastic Retention Device (0.50 ounces) by Kinetic Consulting, or the SBL NVG Lanyard (1.0 ounces) by T.REX Arms illustrate that use of only hook-and-loop retention panels are slightly lighter, but they also only have a rating to approximately 50 pounds. The Wilcox retention lanyards are similarly only 0.50 ounces and have a breakaway rating of 12 pounds, but necessitate direct mounting to an NVG shroud. Thus for the minimal addition in weight, the QD-NVL (V2) still offered superior retention levels and was an appropriate (or average) balance between all market alternatives and designs.

Overall Rating – Above Average (18/25)

Product Link: https://www.leonworx.com/products1/p/qd-nvl-v2-coyote-brown-khaki

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via High Ground Media, LLC, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Introduced circa 2014, the 36” Double Rifle Tac Assault Case by Black Scorpion Outdoor Gear gives the shooter peace of mind knowing their rifles and accessories are encased in a sleek, lightweight soft case.

Built from extremely rugged 1000D nylon, the Tac Assault measures 36.25″ (L) x 12″ (H) x 3.5″ (W) and offers room for two full-sized rifles and extensive MOLLE throughout for expanded functionality.

Exterior

On the front, the Tac Assault has a sleek, almost minimalist accessory pocket measuring 28” (L) x 11.5” (H). Its exterior pocket is secured by SBS zippers and has full MOLLE webbing across the face. On the interior are two hook-and-loop secured sleeves for pistols, papers, or targets on top of which are two additional MOLLE fields to add mountable accessories.

The nylon used to frame two compression straps employ UTX-Flex buckles, and also reinforce two carrying handles. The carrying handles themselves are folded and stitched for increased strength, with one having an attached hook-and-loop closure that can be used to join both handles together.

The rear of the Tac Assault is heavily padded to convert the rifle case into a backpack carry. Two adjustable shoulder straps run nearly the full length of the backpanel and are themselves thickly padded.

Interior

Upon opening the main compartment to the Tac Assault via the zipper, the clamshell opens to reveal dual rifle compartments. Lining the outer edge is a hard-plastic molding encased in nylon that serves to keep both compartments separated when closed, and gives the case its overall rigidity.

Each side features wedge-style ends wherein the stock and muzzle are tucked into and provide the weapon security and stability when stored. Dual 2” hook-and-loop straps further secure the firearm from any excessive movement.

Dividing each storage space is a 29” (L) x 10” (H) center dividing pad to ensure both weapons remain separated.

Specifications:

• Water resistant 1000D nylon
• SBS® zippers
• UTX-Flex Buckles

The Tac Assault case overall measures 36.25″ (L) x 12″ (H) x 3.5″ (W) and is only available in Black.

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Good (4/5): In comparison, the Tac Assault rifle case is $113.99 whereas other rifle cases on the market range in price point, such as by Savior Equipment ($59.95), Condor ($83), Draco ($83), and Voodoo Tactical ($125). While the Tac Assault is on the upper scale of cost, that higher cost is directly attributed to both the quality of its 1000D nylon (cheaper brands use lower denier material) and extensive padding—something not shared by lower cost double rifle cases. While somewhat expensive, the cost for the quality of the item is in good standing.
• Comfort – Good (4/5): The extensive padding on all sides of the Tac Assault rifle case and shoulder straps made for an extremely comfortable case when worn across the back. The nylon itself was soft and well stitched so as to avoid hard corners. Sliding rifles in and out of the clamshell storage compartment was smooth with no hang ups. The carrying handle was a bit uncomfortable, even with the closure, in the hand when the case was fully loaded simply because of the narrow material bearing the weight. This could be easily resolved by the vendor by either adding padding to the closure or making the carrying handles thicker.
• Durability – Excellent (5/5): Given that the entire Tac Assault rifle case is made from 1000D nylon, has a rigid molding to give it added stability and strength, the whole product was amazingly durable. Regular use to, on, and off the range included transporting the case in the back of a truckbed with textured liner and although scuff marks were readily identified (due to the color) no stitching was damaged. Throughout the case there was extensive X-style and bartack stitching that reinforced the overall stress points. The likelihood of long-term wear is minimal assuming the user does not overload or misuse the nylon, which will almost certainly outlast any of the hardware.
• Functionality – Good (4/5): Although using a simplified clamshell design, the Tac Assault case had a large degree of flexibility in its exterior MOLLE webbing to be customized as needed. The exterior accessory pocket itself had a full three-sided zipper so the pocket would lay completely flat when open, thus giving the shooter a good surface to work on when either cleaning firearms, or loading magazines. Otherwise the exterior of the accessory pocket was flush and didn’t have a lot of the large, bulk exterior pockets that are so common on most soft cases. The wedge-style sleeves on the interior provided solid security for rifles to be stored, and the included hook-and-loop straps ensured rifles didn’t slide or move unnecessarily. A noted negative in the rifle case’s function was the shoulder straps on the backpanel were a bit awkward when not in use, with no way to either remove them or store then flat against the case.
• Weight – Average (3/5): At 5.8 pounds the Tac Assault case is only slightly lighter than those market alternatives noted above due to its sleek exterior and durable materials. The Savior 36” double rifle case weighs 5.10 pounds whereas the similar Condor and Draco 36” double rifle cases weighs approximately 6 pounds each, and the Draco is approximately 8 pounds. The weight is directly tied to the denier and amount of nylon to construct the bag, thus giving the Tac Assault case an average weight within the market.

Overall Rating – Good (20/25)

Product Link: https://www.blackscorpiongear.com/collections/range-bags/products/double-rifle-36-tac-assault

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

New for 2021, the Radian Carbon Tripod from Vortex brings together the latest materials and a stable platform to give shooters the critical edge when the shot needs to count. Easily strapped to a backpack, the tripod is easily at home in the field on the hunt, or on the range putting in the work on long distance precision.

Made overall from a combination of carbon fiber and American steel, the Radian Carbon Tripod has an overall deployed height of 67.3” and when collapsed to its lowest position is just 8.3” off the ground with the ball head. But when stowed, the tripod has an overall folded up dimension of just 28” (H) x 6” (W).

Each leg of the Radian is made from carbon fiber construction giving the tripod an overall strength of 55 lbs. Max Load with the Ball Head and 44 lbs. with the Leveling Head. The legs themselves have large rubberized locking lugs (with a vaulted design for rapid deployment) in four sections that give it the ability to adjust to a wide variety of heights. Each leg ends in a rubberized pad/ball with the threaded option to add spiked feet (included) for added traction on loose terrain.

The tripod head of the Radian Carbon is available as either a removable ball or leveling head style that includes dual leveling bubbles (one on the tripod itself and another on the head) to assist in its independent pan and tension control.

An Arca-Swiss Head Mount with a quick-release plate on the tripod gives the Radian Carbon the largest compatibility with a wide array of aftermarket accessories. At the bottom of the tripod head is a counterweight hook to attach stability counterweight if needed.

The Radian Carbon Tripod is available only in carbon black and comes with its own nylon carrying case.

Product Evaluation Scores:

• Cost – Fair (2/5): With an MSRP of $1,199.99 for the Ball Head Kit and $1,099.99 for the Leveling Head Kit, the Radian Carbon Tripod is the most expensive variant of tripods offered from Vortex, and comes in either a ball or leveling platform (featured) version. It consists of some of the lightest and strongest materials available on the market, and can be used in a wide array of applications. Perhaps the closest competitor to the Radian is the TFCT Tripod ($1,270) from RSS/SOAR, while other inexpensive options include the PIGlite-CF4 Carbon Fiber Shooting Tripod ($339 and without tripod head) by Hog Saddle, and the Deathgrip Tripod ($257 with fixed rifle saddle) by BOG. Obviously the market is awash in a variety of tripods offering a variety of lightweight materials and designs. In total, this makes the Radian Carbon Tripod one of the most expensive tripods on the market, something justifiable and at a fair price point with its carbon fiber body and composite metal hardware.
• Comfort – Excellent (5/5): Fully deployed, the Radian Carbon Tripod had an overall excellent comfort level—with a very wide and stable platform, and both the rubberized and spiked feet kept a solid grip to the ground surface with the rifle mounted and while firing. The legs adjusted smoothly and all locking lugs and metal hinges locked securely with no slippage. Most importantly, the tripod head itself moved smoothly and freely (when loosened) and allowed the shooter to find a comfortable position, tilt, and pan.
• Durability – Excellent (5/5): From a durability aspect, the carbon fiber material was among the strongest and lightest on the market, and gave the tripod an excellent level of durability. It bore the weight of a full-length rifle in both the 5.56 and .308 caliber without any flex in the legs, regardless of how far they were extended or compressed. The metal hardware joining the various carbon fiber elements helped ensure the joints of the tripod remained aligned, and moved smoothly. The locking lugs held a secure hold and while engaged prevented any accidental slippage, even when direct pressure was applied. Minor scuffing of the rubberized feet was noted during usage, but that was to be expected over the various terrain types. Wear on these rubberized feet could be further mitigated by using the terrain spikes. Perhaps the only recommendation to Vortex on improvement to the Durability for the Radian tripod overall, would be to consider improvements to the carrying bag, as its internal material and zipper felt sub-par and thin.
• Functionality – Good (4/5): Functionally, the use of the Radian Carbon Tripod was pretty straightforward, with locking lugs having clear icons and directional arrows to denote locking/unlocking while extending the legs. The platform itself was very stable in relation to the free-floating leveling head, that in itself could also be easily adjusted via tension control at the bottom of the leveling head. Moreover, the leveling head could be tilted, or panned and locked into any position desired that give solid support to the shooter. The Arca-Swiss Head Mount itself was also easily removed via the QD lock to install/remove any associated weapon or camera mount (in this review a PIG Saddle). The application of dual leveling bubbles (one on the tripod and one on the head) allowed for quick and easy visual recognition in differences between the angle of the tripod and terrain, and the leveling head to the rifle.
• Weight – Average (3/5): With an overall weight of 7.3 pounds (with the ball head platform on but without weapon mount) and a max height of 67.3”—the Radian Carbon Tripod was of an appropriate (or of average) weight given its overall variable height, lightweight materials, and reinforcing hardware. In contrast, the TFCT Tripod (4.4 pounds w/max height of 71.1”) from RSS/SOAR, the PIGlite-CF4 Carbon Fiber Shooting Tripod (3.6 pounds w/max height of 63.5”) by Hog Saddle, and the Deathgrip Tripod (9.71 pounds for the aluminum version or 9 pounds for the carbon fiber version—both with a max height of 59”) by BOG illustrate that although lighter tripods are available, many lack the overall height of the Radian Carbon (although the Radian it is neither the heaviest nor the tallest).

Overall Rating – Above Average (19/25)

Product Link: https://vortexoptics.com/radian-carbon-leveling-head-tripod-kit.html

I am reviewing this product as a courtesy to the manufacturer and via STL Shooting Enthusiasts, so that I can evaluate it and provide my honest feedback. I am not bound by any written, verbal, or implied contract to give positive reviews. All views are my own, and based off my personal experience with the product.

The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author. The views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.